HUW Edwards should return his BBC salary after admitting accessing indecent images of children, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has said.
Edwards was paid £200,000 after he was arrested in November while he was suspended by the broadcaster up until he resigned in April on medical advice.
On Wednesday, the 62-year-old BBC veteran pleaded guilty to three counts of making 41 indecent images of children.
Tim Davie, BBC director-general, said on Thursday the corporation was aware of Edwards’s arrest and the charges when it happened and was questioned over why he was not sacked and continued to receive his salary – the highest of anybody at BBC News.
He declared that the corporation had made "difficult decisions in a fair and judicious manner".
He added that the BBC will "look at all options" in trying to reclaim pay from Edwards.
Nandy told Sky News at the Paris Olympics on Friday: “I think he ought to return his salary.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer expands police and intelligence powers amid UK riots
"I think having been arrested on such serious charges all the way back in November, to continue to receive that salary all the way through until he resigned is wrong and it's not a good use of taxpayers' money.
"I think most people in the country will agree with that but whether he does that or not is up to him.
"My concern is to make sure that not only are we getting the decision right in this case but we're futureproofing the BBC so that when people come forward with concerns, when decisions like this have to be made we're open and transparent and we're fair and we use taxpayers money appropriately.”
The shamed ex-BBC presenter made his first public appearance on Wednesday since stepping down from his News at Ten role on July 5 last year.
At Westminster Magistrates’ Court, he confessed to creating indecent images of children between December 2020 and August 2021.
Edwards officially stepped down from the BBC after a 40-year tenure in April 2024.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel