A SCOTTISH Parliament probe has found “no evidence” the SNP misused stamps bought with public money to aid its General Election campaign.
Officials launched an inquiry last month after WhatsApp messages among senior staff working for SNP MSPs appeared to suggest stamps paid for by expenses were being used in the party’s push ahead of the July 4 poll.
The investigation by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) – the cross-party group of MSPs tasked with running the Parliament – spoke to the staff involved and their MSP bosses, and said all of whom “complied fully with the investigation”.
READ MORE: John Swinney rejects 'stamp fairy' claims amid Holyrood probe
On Wednesday, officials said there was no evidence to suggest stamps had been misused and they had received assurances from the MSPs to that effect.
A spokesman for the Scottish Parliament said: “Following a thorough investigation, officials have found no evidence that stamps were used inappropriately. Therefore, no further action is required.
“Ahead of the next session the SPCB will carry out a review of stamp purchasing, as part of its sessional review of the members’ expenses scheme, to ensure the current approach is the most suitable.”
The investigation spoke to 10 MSPs and their staff, according a report published on Wednesday, quizzing those involved about the contents of the WhatsApp chat.
In the correspondence, one staff member said the “stamp fairy” was good for campaigns.
When questioned about what the comment meant, the individual said they were referring to local campaigns run by MSPs in their constituencies and not election campaigns.
READ MORE: Southport: Humza Yousaf says EDL should be made terrorist organisation
Election agents in the MSP’s constituencies were also contacted to see if they had received stamps from the Scottish Parliament to use in the campaign, with all saying this had not been the case.
A spokesman for the SNP Holyrood group said: “We welcome the decision by the cross-party MSPs on the Parliamentary Corporate Body that there was no evidence of any misuse of parliamentary resources and that no further action should be taken.
“It is extremely disappointing that obviously light-hearted comments were deliberately taken out of context in an attempt to smear individuals and cause damage during an election campaign.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel