THE Chancellor has been urged to apologise to Scots after announcing huge cuts to public spending.
On Monday, Rachel Reeves told the Commons that the Labour Government will be publishing a “detailed audit” and accused the previous Conservative government of a “cover up”, including hiding £35 billion worth of spending - of which a projected £22bn was not budgeted for.
The Chancellor blamed the cuts partly on the Conservative Party’s handling of the asylum system as she announced the Rwanda Scheme would be scrapped, alongside the axing of the Winter Fuel Payment for those not in receipt of benefits.
READ MORE: Martin Lewis hits out at Labour as Winter Fuel Payment axed for millions
SNP MP Seamus Logan called on the Chancellor to “apologise” to Scots after Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar previously told John Swinney in a TV debate during the election: "Read my lips. No austerity under Labour."
The First Minister was challenging Sarwar on the £18bn of cuts predicted by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS), which accused both Labour and the Tories of being in a "conspiracy of silence" over the need for cuts.
Logan (below) said: “During the recent election campaign, we in the SNP repeatedly warned about an £18 billion hole in the Labour Party’s spending plans.
“Now that you’ve confirmed that today, Chancellor, will you apologise to those voters in Scotland who supported the Labour Party leader in Scotland when he said ‘read my lips – no austerity’?
“And will you also reverse the 9% cut in Scotland’s capital allocation?”
Responding, Reeves said: “I’m not sure if the honourable gentleman was actually paying attention.
“The £22bn black hole is this year. The IFS was warning about a black hole over the lifetime of the parliament of £18bn.
READ MORE: Top Scottish lawyer to represent family involved in Manchester Airport incident
“Those are two very different things, and both of them can be true.
“What we are showing today is an in-year gap of £22bn that the honourable gentleman didn’t know about, no one on this side of the house knew about, the OBR [Office for Budget Responsibility] did not know about, and the country did not know about.
“This is new information that is being published today above and beyond what anyone knew when we were campaigning in the election.”
'Everybody and their granny knew'
SNP deputy Westminster leader Pete Wishart later said “everybody and their granny” knew about the condition of public finances and Reeves’ decision to cut the winter fuel payment “seems and feels like Tory austerity”.
Wishart (below) told MPs: “Everybody and their granny knew that there would be a multibillion pound black hole, only the Chancellor seemed to be deaf and blind to the situation, but we knew she was going to be here explaining the sheer scale of it.”
He added: “Isn’t it the case that cutting winter fuel payments to all pensioners seems and feels like Tory austerity? And what discussions has she had with the Scottish Government? Because she will know obviously that this is a devolved responsibility.”
Reeves replied: “The chief secretary briefed the Scottish Government today on these decisions. These are decisions that are necessary and it is not in the interests of the Scottish people to have unfunded commitments and put our public finances and our reputation for economic stability at risk.
“These are not easy decisions. These are difficult decisions. But the fault of these decisions lies with the previous government.
And to claim that this is austerity today, when we have just given a pay rise to more than two million public sector workers – [Wishart] doesn’t know what he’s talking about.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel