THE use of emergency legislation by the Conservative Party to ban puberty blockers was lawful, the High Court has ruled.
In May, the UK Government brought in a ban on the prescription of puberty blockers for under-18s experiencing gender dysphoria in England, Wales and Scotland.
The drugs are used to delay the onset of puberty and are utilised in other countries as a means to give young people more time to consider their gender identity.
They are also used legally in the UK for conditions such as precocious puberty.
READ MORE: Scottish Tory MP Andrew Bowie says he 'governed poorly' as a minister
The ban was due to last from June 3 to September 3 and applied within both the NHS and to private healthcare providers.
The Labour Government has since indicated that it is considering making the ban permanent.
However, campaign group TransActual alongside a young person who cannot be named sought to challenge the Tories’ use of emergency legislation to enforce the banning order.
At a hearing at the High Court in London earlier this month, lawyers for the group argued that the actions of the UK Government were unlawful.
But on Monday Justice Lang ruled that the legislation was lawful and said courts should be “slow to interfere” on the issue.
She said: “This decision required a complex and multi-factored predictive assessment, involving the application of clinical judgment and the weighing of competing risks and dangers, with which the court should be slow to interfere.”
It comes after Health Secretary Wes Streeting faced criticism for his fulsome support of the Cass Review despite criticism from academics at Yale Law School, who described the report on transgender healthcare for young people provided by the NHS in England as being “rife with misapplications of the scientific method.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel