ENERGY minister Michael Shanks has cast fresh doubt on Labour’s claims they would help cut bills by £300.
The Labour minister refused to confirm that his party’s energy policy would bring down bills by that amount – as he appeared to back away from using the £300 figure.
It throws up further questions for the party, as Labour previously claimed they would cut household bills during the election campaign.
The Tories have said the claim is a “lie” and Shanks was questioned about it during an energy policy debate in the Commons on Friday.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer faces questions on £300 energy bills election promise
Former Tory chairman Richard Holden (below) said the public “absolutely need to know” how much Labour’s energy plans would cost them.
He said: “It’s been causing quite a lot of confusion in the national media over the last couple of days when Downing Street have been saying one thing, [energy minister Michael Shanks’] department have been saying another.
“Can he now confirm, on the parliamentary record, how much GB Energy will save, or cost, British billpayers by the time of the next election?”
Shanks accused the Tory MP of having a “brass neck” as he avoided getting into specifics on the policy.
READ MORE: What Labour's GB Energy really means for Scotland – and is nuclear on the cards?
He said: “I think it does take a bit of a brass neck to come here and talk about bringing down bills when the government that he supported for a long time saw those skyrocket.
“We’ve been very clear, bills will come down, we said that throughout the campaign, we said that yesterday and we stand by that because bills must come down, but this isn’t going to happen overnight.”
It follows days of confusion over the policy, after Energy Secretary Ed Miliband (above) also appeared to walk back specific promises about savings in interviews earlier in the week.
Downing Street also refused to confirm the £300 on Thursday but Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that he stood by it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel