THE SNP’s Westminster leader was told off by the Speaker during PMQs for breaking a key Commons rule.
As he challenged Keir Starmer over his backing of the two-child cap, Speaker Lindsay Hoyle rapped Flynn for using a “prop”.
He was holding up a front page of the Daily Record showing former prime minister Gordon Brown telling Starmer to ditch the policy.
The SNP's Stephen Flynn was told off for breaking a key Commons rule as he challenged Keir Starmer over the two-child cap 👀 pic.twitter.com/VRNq7u5oz0
— The National (@ScotNational) July 24, 2024
Flynn was speaking after Starmer suspended seven of his MPs for voting for an SNP amendment calling for the two-child cap to be scrapped.
He said: "Just five days before the General Election in Scotland, on the front page of the Daily Record, Gordon Brown instructed voters to vote Labour to end child poverty.
"Yet last night Labour MPs from Scotland were instructed to retain the two-child cap which forces children into poverty. So Prime Minister, what changed?"
READ MORE: Sky News hosts slam Labour ministers for ducking media scrutiny
Starmer started to reply saying he was glad to hear Gordon Brown mentioned because the last Labour government "lifted millions of children out of poverty".
The Labour leader was then interrupted by the Speaker however, who could be heard saying to Flynn: "Props are not allowed to be used. Never mind, put it down. We don't need anymore."
(Image: Lucy North/PA Wire)
Starmer (above) then continued speaking to say Labour have put a new taskforce in place to tackle child poverty.
"I would just say this. Before he lectures everyone else, he should explain why, since the SNP came to power, there are 30,000 more children in poverty in Scotland," the Labour leader said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel