SCOTTISH comedian Frankie Boyle has torn into a Labour MP who posted a picture “celebrating” keeping the two-child benefits cap in place – alongside multiple people giving the middle finger.
Labour MP Deirdre Costigan shared an image of herself smiling alongside a group of Labour activists and politicians along with the caption “celebrating putting country before party”.
The image and caption was originally posted by Labour councillor Joshua Garfield late on Thursday, just hours after his party voted down an SNP amendment to scrap the two-child benefit cap, which affects 1.6 million children in the UK and is seen as a key driver of child poverty.
As well as Costigan and Garfield, other senior Labour figures are also in the image, including Shama Tatler – who was controversially installed as a Labour General Election candidate after Faiza Shaheen was ousted – and Abdi Duale – who sits on Labour's national executive committee.
Labour have come under heavy fire for the photo, with Scottish comedian Frankie Boyle among those to condemn it.
“Very tricky to judge the tone when you’ve just voted against benefits for children, leaving untold numbers of them in poverty, but I think this has nailed it,” Boyle quipped, sharing Garfield’s image.
Karl Hansen, the editor of the Tribune, shared a zoomed part of the image highlighting the people giving the middle finger.
He wrote: “A message to the half a million children who would have been immediately lifted out of poverty if the two-child cap had been abolished.”
READ MORE: Here's how the 37 Scottish Labour MPs voted on two-child benefit cap
University of Glasgow historian Ewan Gibbs commented: “What you have to realise is that for lots of these people, ‘beating the Trots,’ keeping the left down and owning the SNP is what matters.
“The consequences of politics are a distant second to the process and finally getting a shot at crowing about winning in Westminster bars.”
Niall Christie, who stood for the Greens at the General Election, commented: “If the Tories were celebrating a vote keeping children in poverty like this it’d rightly be on the front of national newspapers.”
The National contributor Owen Jones wrote: “This is the Labour leadership faction celebrating suspending MPs for voting to lift little kids out of squalor and misery.”
Labour have been asked for comment.
As the photo continued to draw condemnation, Labour NEC member Duale claimed the celebration had nothing to do with the vote on the two-child benefit cap that had happened just hours before.
Garfield also made the claim, writing: "This photo is of some friends after a summer reception celebrating the Labour victory three weeks ago.
"I haven't passed comment on parliamentary votes – this reception was long planned and unrelated. People drawing their own conclusions are making a lot of assumptions."
Clarification: The National would like to make clear that this event was arranged prior to the two-child cap vote as a celebration of Labour’s electoral results – the caption has been amended to reflect that, having originally suggested that the celebration was directly linked to the vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel