ECONOMISTS from across the globe attended a conference at Leeds University this week – with many having something to add to the debate on Scotland's economic potential.
Thinkers from the USA, including leading author Stephanie Kelton and former chief economist on the US Senate Budget Committee and Economics professor Randel Wray, were in no doubt that Scotland had to be “financially independent” before it could start introducing the policies necessary to transform its economy.
READ MORE: Scottish firm takes major step to become largest UK seaweed producer
Academics delivered papers from Argentina and the USA explaining the role of interest rates in increasing inflation, directly countering the mainstream story that rising interest rates slow down the economy.
Other papers included a look at the Japanese economy, which has a 250% debt-to-GDP ratio (well over twice the level of the UK), and how it maintains a low level of unemployment, inflation and a stable currency. This contradicts the concerns we repeatedly hear about public debt.
Thibault Laurentjoye with William Thomson (Image: Scotonomics)
After delivering a paper that discussed sovereign debt defaults, a situation when countries are unable to pay their debts, Associate Professor of Economics Thibault Laurentjoye from Aalborg University Business School in Denmark responded directly to a question about the current Scottish Government policy on sterlingisation, which will see Scotland continue using the currency issued by the Bank of England once the country is independent.
He said: “I can hardly understate how terrible an idea it is to borrow in a foreign currency. Over 97% of outstanding defaults happen when countries borrow in a currency that they do not issue.”
John Ryan-Collins, a professor at University College London, explained that the Lis Truss "mini-budget" was more about a lack of co-ordination between No 10 and the Bank of England than any power display by bond traders.
He expressed concern that Labour’s misrepresentation of the episode may damage their political space and prevent them from implementing the changes the UK needs.
Cameron Archibald, a newly appointed public policy and economics analyst for Scotonomics, asked a panel of economists which one policy they would suggest to an independent Scotland.
The panel, which included American economist Pavelina Tcherneva and Yan Liang, an expert on the Chinese economy, confirmed the importance of a job guarantee for an independent Scotland.
READ MORE: Dundee researcher awarded prestigious fellowship with £1.8m in funding
The panel said that such a policy would support lower inflation in an economy where everyone who wants a job has one.
Cameron, and Scotonomics co-founder Kairin Van Sweeden, had their proposal for a job guarantee taken up as the official SNP policy at the 2021 SNP conference.
Cameron said: "It was fantastic to receive clarification from such an established panel of economists that a government job guarantee scheme must support a wellbeing economy. We hope this clarification encourages the current administration to learn more about this policy.”
All the presentations provided evidence that many of the constraints that governments use to justify low investment and public spending are, as Stephanie Kelton said, “nothing but fiction".
Remember to sign up for Scotonomics' free weekly newsletter.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel