A YOUNG woman accused of throwing a milkshake over Nigel Farage has denied assault by beating and criminal damage.
The Reform UK leader was doused with what appeared to be a McDonald’s banana milkshake as he left the Moon and Starfish Wetherspoon pub in Clacton-on-Sea in Essex on June 4.
Farage, who is now Clacton MP, had earlier addressed supporters at a rally in the seaside town during the General Election campaign.
The veteran Brexiteer, 60, was left with the yellow liquid splattered across his dark blue suit.
Victoria Thomas Bowen, 25, of St Osyth Road in the seaside town, pleaded not guilty to both charges at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday.
READ MORE: Angela Rayner: Labour will not change two-child cap in King's Speech
Prosecutors say £30 of criminal damage was caused to a jacket belonging to James Woolfenden.
Caroline Liggins, partner at Hodge Jones & Allen, the law firm representing Bowen, said: “My client strongly protests her innocence and looks forward to fighting these unjust charges in court.”
Bowen was released on unconditional bail to appear before the same court for trial on October 21.
If proved, the offence of assault by beating, contrary to Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, carries a maximum penalty of six months’ custody and/or an unlimited fine.
Being convicted of the criminal damage charge could lead to three months’ custody and/or a maximum fine of £2500.
Last month, 28-year-old Josh Greally admitted throwing a coffee cup and another item at Farage as he campaigned on his battle bus in Barnsley, South Yorkshire, on Tuesday June 11.
Greally, of Damsbrook Drive, Clowne, Derbyshire, appeared before a district judge at Barnsley Magistrates’ Court, where he pleaded guilty to a public order offence.
He will be sentenced on August 28 at the same court.
During a campaign walkabout in Newcastle in 2019, Farage had a banana and salted caramel milkshake thrown at him.
“Milkshaking” – the act of dousing public figures in milkshake – was officially recognised by Collins Dictionary the same year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel