HOPES a troubled state-owned shipyard could be awarded a major ferry contract have been dashed by the Scottish Government – as it unveiled a new funding package to “secure” its future.
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes on Tuesday poured cold water on Ferguson Marine’s hopes it would be awarded a £175 million contract to build new small electric ferries for CalMac.
The contract will be put out to tender but Forbes has effectively ruled out the Port Glasgow yard from taking it on, saying that to do so “introduces substantial risks and uncertainties for the shipyard and the communities which rely on the lifeline vessels”.
But she has unveiled a funding package worth up to £14.2m over the next two years, subject to legal analysis and independent financial and commercial assessments to be completed in the autumn.
READ MORE: Plans move forward to replace ageing ferry fleet as £175m contract announced
The money is intended to put the yard in fit shape to bid for and secure new work, amid concerns about its operations because of the lengthy delays in the construction of the Glen Sannox and the Glen Rosa.
Meanwhile, talks between the yard, the Government and BAE Systems to allow Ferguson Marine to take on more work on the defence giant’s Type 36 Frigate programme are at their final stages.
BAE appears optimistic more work building warships will be secured for the the Port Glasgow yard.
A company spokesperson said: “BAE Systems has a good working relationship with Ferguson Marine, which is a key local supplier of structural steelwork and has built two units for the Type 26 programme.
“We are in advanced negotiations with the company regarding further strengthening our partnership, the placement of additional work subject to agreement of terms and its continued involvement in the programme.”
READ MORE: 'Significant' number of new jobs as Scottish firm invests £9m in nanojet facility
Forbes said that as the Glen Sannox neared completion, ministers’ attentions were focused on the yard’s “next phase”.
Glen Rosa was launched in April this year but the Glen Sannox was hit by further delays that month, with bosses blaming a “lack of available expert knowledge and qualified resources in the UK” to properly build its liquefied natural gas dual fuel propulsion system.
After further delays, is now expected to be delivered by the middle of August.
Forbes (above) said: “The board has developed a business plan that it believes has the potential to secure a competitive future.
READ MORE: Met Office issues yellow weather warning for Scotland as heavy rains expected
“Subject to independent legal and commercial analysis, the Scottish Government will provide significant new funding to support the yard’s modernisation and improve productivity.
“Additional funding goes hand in hand with winning new commercial contracts, and it is extremely good news that talks with BAE Systems to secure further work have reached this advanced stage.
“Extensive analysis and legal advice confirm that a direct award of the small vessels phase one contract to FMPG introduces substantial risks and uncertainties for the shipyard and the communities which rely on the lifeline vessels, due to the strict conditions imposed by the UK Subsidy Control Act.”
The Deputy First Minister said that the Government would instead do “everything which is legally possible to support the yard and the workforce to secure a long-term future”.
She said the Government had come to an agreement with the yard’s management “on initiatives and funding to improve productivity”.
Forbes added: “When the Scottish Government stepped in to save [Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow] in 2019 we did so to preserve jobs and develop the next generation of shipbuilders on the River Clyde.
“That commitment remains unwavering. The company will of course be able to consider a bid, either individually or in partnership with other yards, but its long term future depends on winning work on a competitive basis.”
Willie Rennie, the Scottish LibDems’ economy spokesperson, said: “We’re all praying that the SNP Government don’t repeat the horrific mistakes of the last two ferries built at Ferguson Shipyard although the loss of the expertise provided by David Tydeman is a great concern.
“The decision to opt for a competitive tender process is risky as the yard needs a regular drumbeat of orders and work to maintain the skilled workers essential for the construction of the ferries.”
Chris McEleny, the general secretary of the Alba Party who has been campaigning for Ferguson Marine to be directly awarded the contract, added: “This is nothing short of a betrayal of the people of Inverclyde and the workforce at Ferguson’s in Port Glasgow.
“I have been campaigning for the Scottish Government to directly award this work to Ferguson’s, warning them that if they did not then there would be no steel left to cut at the yard, no work left and no orders in the pipeline. This means one thing and one thing only - the closure of the yard.
“The Scottish Government should be under no doubt: their decision today not to directly award this work to Ferguson’s has put shipbuilding on the lower Clyde on the verge of extinction.
“And I am ashamed to say that this hasn’t been done by a Labour or a Tory Government but by an SNP Government that has sadly lost its way.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel