DONALD Trump's newly-appointed running mate has described the UK as an "Islamist country" with nuclear weapons.
JD Vance was announced as the Republican pick for vice president on Monday.
His remarks, made during a speech at a conservative conference last Wednesday, may prove embarrassing to UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who had been courting the likely vice-presidential nominee in recent weeks.
READ MORE: Labour will not change two-child cap with King's Speech, Angela Rayner says
Vance said the assertion resulted from a conversation with a friend, where they were debating what country would be the "first truly Islamist country to get a nuclear weapon".
He said: "Maybe it's Iran, maybe Pakistan already kind of counts, and then we finally decided that it's actually the UK, since Labour took over."
Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman also spoke at the conference, where she described the state of the Tory party as "terrible" and attributed its defeat at the General Election to Nigel Farage's Reform party.
Angela Rayner has denied Vance's characterisation of the UK, telling Good Morning Britain: "Look, I don’t recognise that characterisation. I’m very proud of the election success that Labour had recently.
READ MORE: Gareth Southgate resigns as England manager after Euro final defeat
"We won votes across all different communities, across the whole of the country. And we’re interested in governing on behalf of Britain and also working with our international allies."
Treasury minister James Murray told Sky News that he did not know what Vance was talking about.
He told Sky News: “I don’t really understand those comments.
“I genuinely heard that comment, and I don’t know what he was driving at in that comment, to be honest. I mean, in Britain, we’re very proud of our diversity.
“I’m very proud that we have a new Government, I’m very proud that our Labour Government is committed to national security and economic growth. I don’t really know how that comment fits in.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel