LEGAL investigations are under way after a person was poisoned by a sandwich bought at a Scottish garage, lawyers say.
Experts with Digby Brown Solicitors are probing the case of a woman who was reportedly hospitalised for four days after eating an Asda chicken salad sandwich bought from a Shell garage in Elgin.
It is understood that there could be a route to compensation through either Shell as the vendor or Asda as the producer.
The Elgin case is thought to be linked to E. coli. Across the UK, at least 288 cases have been reported and 128 people admitted to hospital due to an outbreak of the bacteria linked to a type of lettuce, health officials said last week.
A number of food manufacturers have recalled sandwiches, wraps and salads sold in major supermarkets and retail chains over fears they are linked to the outbreak.
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has said lettuce used in the products is thought to be the likely source of the problems.
READ MORE: One person dies linked to E.coli outbreak ‘spread by lettuce’
The Elgin investigation is understood to be the first legal step in Scotland, where as many as 60 food poisoning cases have been reported.
Mark Gibson, partner at Digby Brown Solicitors and one Scotland’s top food poisoning lawyers, said: “Our involvement is in the very early stages but what I can say is we have been asked to support a person who was poisoned after eating an Asda chicken salad sandwich purchased at a petrol station in Elgin.
“This person suffered really horrendous symptoms and needed hospital treatment – thankfully, they received the right medical care after health professionals confirmed the presence of E. coli.
“The reality is that E.coli can only be confirmed by analysing a blood or stool sample so if anyone has any health concerns the first thing they should do is seek medical advice.
“Having a confirmed diagnosis, in addition to proof of purchase, are the two vital components needed for any food poisoning claim.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel