JEREMY Corbyn has been overheard calling a parliamentary tradition “a load of nonsense” while waiting to be sworn in as an MP.
Corbyn, who won the Islington North seat as an Independent – after being kicked out of the Labour Party in May – could be heard making the comment on Parliament Live TV on Tuesday afternoon.
As he was waiting in line to be sworn in, he said to a colleague: “This is such a load of old nonsense, isn’t it?”
🚨 NEW: Jeremy Corbyn is caught on microphone whispering "this is such a load of nonsense, isn't it?" before he is about to be sworn in as an MP pic.twitter.com/CYaD9Nu0KE
— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) July 9, 2024
After MPs are elected following a General Election or by-election, they must take an oath of allegiance to the Crown before being able to take their seat in Parliament.
Members can either be sworn in using a religious text or take a non-religious affirmation.
One social media user wrote: “An honest politician.”
READ MORE: Laughter as Stephen Flynn quips about SNP election result in first Commons speech
Another said: “Corbyn is right. The whole system is full of nonsense with these rituals but also that the House of Lords is still unelected like it was in the 17th century.”
In the past, MPs have subverted or refused to take the oath of allegiance, often for its connections to the monarchy.
Steven Bonnar, who was until recently MP for Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill, caused a storm in 2019 when he crossed his fingers as he made his “solemn affirmation” to the monarch.
In the same year, Mhairi Black – the Paisley and Renfrewshire South MP who did not stand for re-election in 2024 – added caveats when she swore in to Parliament, adding to the official script that her allegiance was “first and foremost” to her Paisley constituents and that she was making the pledge “for the purpose of the job”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel