ANAS Sarwar has been accused of a “total betrayal of democracy” after ditching support for electoral reform.
It comes after Labour achieved a landslide victory in the General Election last week on a vote share of just 34 per cent, just a 1.6 percentage point increase from the party's share in 2019.
In Scotland, the situation was similar with Labour winning 65.0% of Scottish seats (37) on 35.3% of the vote and the SNP ending up with just 15.8% of the seats (9) with 30% of the vote.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn blames SNP election defeat on 'internal difficulties'
But Anas Sarwar said the public does not want a “big debate” about changes, despite the Labour conference in 2022 calling for a shift towards a “proportional” model and now Prime Minister Keir Starmer previously indicating support for the switch in 2020.
The Scottish Labour leader, speaking on BBC Scotland’s The Sunday Show, said: “This is the system, this is the rules, and this has been the case even when we had, for example, one MP [in Scotland] even though we had much higher votes in proportion.
“That’s the system we’re in. Our manifesto set out that we support the current voting system and we’ve got to make this system work. Everyone knew the rules going into the election campaign. We’ve fought the election campaign and we won the election campaign.
“We don’t make the rules, we played the election by the rules. Let’s not have another big debate about changing the voting system, I’d much rather get on with changing our country.”
Now, the Scottish Greens have slammed Sarwar’s comments – saying that the party “must not turn its back on electoral reform just because it has benefited from the system this time.”
“To do so would be a total betrayal of democracy,” MSP Maggie Chapman (above) said.
“Voters across Scotland and the UK have, time and again, been let down by this disproportionate system which in too many cases leads to voters being represented by MPs they did not vote for.
“The Scottish Greens want to see a fairer voting system at all levels of elections in the UK, ensuring all levels of government reflect the range of political views that people support.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel