REFORM UK’s wins in England have been among the major stories of this election – but the party’s impact in Scotland has gone largely unrecognised.
The party secured four seats in England, with most of its biggest names – party leader Nigel Farage, chairman Richard Tice and former Tory MP Lee Anderson – all winning in their respective constituencies.
Despite gaining significantly less traction in Scotland – and failing to secure any parliamentary seats – Reform still won around a 7% share of the vote north of the Border, half the UK-wide total of 14%.
READ MORE: Why have Reform UK and Nigel Farage done so well?
Dumfries and Galloway, one of the last constituencies to be announced, gave the anti-immigration party a late boost, securing their highest percentage of the vote share in Scotland at 9.4% (4313 votes).
Nigel Farage’s party saw the greatest success in areas traditionally dominated by Unionist voters such as those around Borders and the north-eastern Aberdeenshire region.
Aberdeen North, for example, was held by the SNP’s Kirsty Blackman after a split in the Unionist vote with Reform, Labour, the Conservatives and the LibDems securing a total of 60.2% of the vote share, to just 34.5% for the SNP. Nigel Farage’s party had one of their strongest Scottish results there, winning 9% of votes.
The party largely failed to replicate their results in England, where many constituencies saw the right-wing party take second place to Labour, far exceeding the Conservatives results.
The change reflects a stronger shift away from the Conservatives south of the Border, especially in constituencies which were already held by the Labour party, in which Reform effectively took the place of the now-governing party’s main opposition.
However the Scottish wing of the party did pick up a fairly consistent proportion of the vote across the country’s 57 constituencies, with its results varying between around 4% and 9% in most.
READ MORE: How does voter turnout compare with previous elections?
The success of the party in the UK as a whole may lead to increased demand for a change in the Westminster voting system, with the Green Party of England and Wales also securing four seats and the LibDems earning 71 – all three of which support proportional representation.
And while Labour have won 412 seats at Westminster, the party scooped up 34% of the popular vote, just a 1.6 percentage point increase from the party's share in 2019 and a six percentage point fall from the 40% won under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017.
The lower overall turnout means that despite increasing Labour's vote share, the party secured just 9,686,329 overall votes in 2024, compared with a total of 10,295,912 under Jeremy Corbyn in 2019 - a result deemed a catastrophic failure by many.
There is therefore a significantly greater disparity between the size of the victory for the governing party and their share of the popular vote than in previous elections.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel