JOANNA Cherry has lost her seat amid a Labour landslide sweeping the SNP away across the central belt.
The long-standing SNP MP held Edinburgh South West for the party from 2015 but was ousted on Friday morning by Labour’s Scott Arthur.
The top lawyer and women’s rights activist is a controversial figure even within her own party because of her views on transgender self-identification – but was predicted by some opinion polls to keep her seat.
(Image: NQ)
But Arthur trounced her with 18,663 votes to 12,446.
Cherry played a high-profile role in the SNP group at Westminster and led the charge against Boris Johnson’s unlawful prorogation of Parliament as part of the party’s anti-Brexit crusade.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn says SNP 'must listen' as he holds on to seat amid heavy losses
She was criticised by opponents and won fans within and outwith the SNP over her stances on sex and gender.
Speaking after losing her seat, Cherry said: "This is the first time that I've had to make a losing speech on an election night and I hope it will be the last.
"The story of tonight is of course the Labour landslide, and it reflects massive dissatisfaction with the previous Conservative government.
"Sadly, the Scottish National Party has been a casualty of that landslide.
"But, to be honest, there have been other factors which have made it less likely for people to vote SNP, and that's made it hard for us.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross loses seat to SNP in Aberdeenshire North and Moray East
"The defeat of many SNP candidates tonight means that my party must now have the courage to address what has gone wrong in recent years, otherwise this setback for the Scottish National Party will not be reversed.
"I will have a lot more to say about that in the days and weeks to come.
"However, this setback for the SNP should not be interpreted as a setback for the cause of Scottish independence.
"The issue of our constitutional question is still very much alive, and Labour would be foolish to ignore that.
"Labour have promised change, and now they must deliver on that promise."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel