JOHN Curtice has predicted this election has seen “one of the lower turnouts” in the post-war period.
The polling expert said there had been a “widespread expectation that turnout would fall” and that early results were bearing this out.
Asked whether low turnout would affect the final result, Curtice said: “Well we don’t know whether it’s a contributing factor (to the final result) but I think there has been a widespread expectation that turnout would fall and these first two results are at least consistent with that expectation and to that extent at least we may well discover that we’re heading towards one of the lower turnouts in general elections in post-war electoral history and, you know, that’s what the polls are anticipating.”
READ MORE: John Curtice issues exit poll 'health warning' over SNP and Reform predictions
He suggested that the apparent certainty of a Labour win and a lack of distinctiveness between the two main parties were to blame.
Curtice (above) said: “It’s what you would expect in an election in which the polls were suggesting it’s pretty clear who was going to win and where there wasn’t that much difference despite both parties’ denials – not that much difference between Conservative and Labour in much of what they were offering the electorate.”
READ MORE: Why exit poll is not the worst-case scenario for independence supporters
It comes after an exit poll predicted a massive Labour landslide of 410 seats for Keir Starmer’s party.
According to the research, which came with major caveats for Scotland, the Tories would win just 131 seats.
The survey, overseen by Curtice and a team of researchers, predicted the LibDems would take the SNP’s place as the official opposition with Ed Davey’s party on 61 seats.
It also suggested that the SNP could be reduced to just 10 seats, three behind Nigel Farage’s Reform.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here