THE General Election exit poll has predicted a landslide victory for Labour, while the SNP are projected to win just 10 seats in Scotland.
Across the UK, the Ipsos survey predicted that Keir Starmer will enter Downing Street with 410 MPs, a huge Labour majority of 170.
The Conservatives meanwhile are set for a long night, with the exit poll predicting they will win 131 MPs in a result branded a "massacre" by former Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson.
The LibDems were predicted to win 61 MPs, Reform 13, the Greens two, and Plaid Cymru four.
The number of people surveyed in Scotland and Wales means that some caution has to be applied to the SNP and Plaid Cymru results. However, the exit poll is known to be largely accurate.
In 2019, it predicted 368 seats for the Tories – who went on to win 365. It predicted 191 for Labour, who won 203, and 55 for the SNP, who won 48.
However, there are some odd results predicted in the Scottish constituencies that have put a question mark over the results in Scotland.
Aberdeen South, Stephen Flynn's constituency, is predicted to be won by either the Conservatives or Labour.
Dumfries and Galloway, where Alister Jack was the MP, is "too close to call" – with the exit poll predicting that it could be won by Labour, which seems vanishingly unlikely in reality.
The true results won't be known in full until Friday morning, with the first Scottish seats expected to begin declaring at around 1am, with the final ones doing so five or six hours later.
Professor John Curtice told the BBC: "Whilst we’ve got 133 polling stations across Britain as a whole where the exit poll is being conducted, we only have 16 in Scotland. We boosted the number because we knew Scotland was gong to be difficult, but there is inevitably a limit to that.
"If we have to some degree and only even mildly overestimated Labour’s advantage over SNP then maybe SNP’s figure will be higher than 10. That said we are going to have to be seriously wrong if it is anything other than Labour emerging with the most seats north of Border."
The poll – commissioned by Sky News, the BBC, and ITV News – is designed by an academic team of political scientists, led by Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University, and is carried out by the research company Ipsos at some 144 polling stations across the UK.
Curtice previously told the PA news agency: “Wherever possible we go back to the same places as last time. The method of the exit poll is that you compare the results in the selected polling stations this time, with the results of the exit poll last time.”
As well as the identical ballots, a replica ballot box is used as part of the process; Curtice said it’s done in this way to “maximise the confidentiality of people’s votes”.
He added: “To ask them to tell an interviewer [how they voted], then they might be reluctant to do that, so you’re trying to minimise the level of refusal, which is always an issue.”
The number of people approached at a polling station is known as a “systematic sample”, Curtice said, and the size of the samples varies according to the registered electorate for that area. In 2019, Ipsos surveyed more than 19,000 people to produce its exit poll.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel