VOTER turnout on Thursday appeared to be in line with the previous general election, according to returning officers, despite predictions of a voting lull.
The election was expected to have a relatively low voter turnout due to widespread disenchantment with politics, but the actual percentage may remain consistent with the 2019 election, according to The Times.
Worth saying that if turnout the same as last election, returning officers' anecdotal evidence suggests, that's still fairly high
— Chris Smyth (@Smyth_Chris) July 4, 2024
Was 67% in 2019, lower than 2017 but higher than any other since 1997
1997 was 71% - at the time a postwar low
2001 fell to a record low of 59% https://t.co/a6wFNaCayr
The Conservatives claimed turnout had been “higher than expected” despite suggestions that predictions of a comfortable Labour victory would mean many voters stayed at home.
However, Peter Stanyon, chief executive of the Association of Electoral Administrators, told The Times: “We’re expecting turnout to be comparable to what it was in the last general election.”
With returning officers reporting “busy” polling stations, Stanyon said: “There’s certainly not been a massive drop-off or far more people voting. It’s hard to know for sure but we seem to be in about the same sort of region we were last time.”
The 67% turnout in 2019 was lower than 2017 but higher than any other election since 1997.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here