THOUSANDS of Orange Order members paraded through Gourock at the weekend, leaving parts of the town at a standstill.
On what was the first day of the school summer holidays, dozens of coaches blocked roads in the area as around 30 bands from the 12 lodges that make up the Ayrshire, Renfrewshire and Argyll organising body took part in the annual Boyne event.
READ MORE: Gourock Orange walk: Businesses disrupted and closures announced
The procession gathered at Battery Park at around 11.30am on Saturday before making its way along Eldon Street, Cardwell Road, Broomberry Drive, Barrhill Road, St John's Road and Shore Street.
The marchers returned to Battery Park three hours later with temporary parking restrictions eventually removed.
Three-hundred stewards escorted the parade along the length of the route while a heavy police presence stayed in the area for the duration of the event.
In the lead-up to the parade, the Loyal Orange Institution of Scotland said the events commemorating the 334th anniversary of the Battle of the Boyne hold "a special place in our hearts, symbolising the triumph of freedom and the enduring spirit of our Protestant community".
"As we gather in unity, let us remember the significance of this victory and the principles it upholds - liberty, civil and religious freedoms, and loyalty to the Crown."
David Walters, executive officer for the Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland, previously told the Greenock Telegraph that Gourock and Greenock residents had "absolutely nothing to fear" from the procession and its participants - with more than 40 public objections raised before Inverclyde councillors gave the event the go-ahead.
Last week a Scottish councillor offered an “unreserved apology” after using sectarian language in a newspaper column in support of the Orange march.
Inverclyde councillor Drew McKenzie wrote a column in the Greenock Telegraph on Wednesday in which he described King William the Third as a “Proddy” and King James the Second and Seventh as a “Tim”.
He also said the Orange walk would be “quite a spectacle", while using other provocative sectarian language.
David Scott, director of the anti-sectarian group Nil by Mouth, said he had received a number of complaints from people in Gourock about the article.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel