Midlothian: winner in 2019 –Owen Thompson (SNP)
THE constituencies in which it’s hardest to find much reason for SNP optimism in this General Election are the seven that were actually won by Labour in 2017 – and Midlothian is one of those.
Although the SNP incumbent Owen Thompson only lost by two percentage points that year and subsequently took the seat back by a reasonably comfortable 12-point margin in 2019, it’s very difficult to see why Labour wouldn’t regain it this year if they were able to previously do so under Jeremy Corbyn at a time when they were still as much as 10 points behind the SNP across Scotland. There was also an equivalent Midlothian seat in the Scottish Parliament until 2011, and ominously Labour won that by seven percentage points even in 2007, when the SNP were ahead of Labour in the national popular vote.
A question mark would only creep in if Keir Starmer was attracting a very different coalition of Labour support than Corbyn did, in which case the Labour vote might have a different geographical distribution now than in 2017.
That would mimic, for example, the way in which Tory-held seats with lots of Remain voters proved much more vulnerable to the SNP in 2019 than the more Brexit-friendly fishing constituencies.
Intuitively, the radical leap from Corbynism to Starmerism ought to be producing a similar sort of effect, but in practice there’s no evidence that it is.
Voters swinging back to Labour in Midlothian in 2024 are probably motivated by a reversion to an old tribal instinct in the same way as they were seven years ago, and might be imagining that they are somehow “kicking the Tories out” – without realising that voting SNP is just as effective a way of doing that in any SNP-Labour battleground seat where the Tories have no chance.
Additionally, although Midlothian was a solidly Labour constituency from its creation in 1955 until the SNP’s post-indyref landslide of 2015, there was always a significant minority support for right-wing or centrist parties. In 2010, the combined vote for the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives was 29%, creating a substantial pool of voters who might now consider voting Labour either for anti-SNP tactical reasons, or simply because they are tired of Tory rule and find Starmer’s centre-right offer appealing.
In spite of the proximity to Edinburgh, the SNP cannot even pin their hopes on disproportionately high levels of opposition to Brexit. Midlothian in fact voted Remain in the 2016 referendum by a margin of 62% to 38%, exactly in line with Scotland as a whole.
And the No vote against independence in 2014 was a touch bigger than the national average at 56%. The only point that leaps out in the SNP’s favour is that 70% of the constituency’s population have an exclusively Scottish national identity, which is well above the equivalent Scotland-wide figure – but clearly that hasn’t translated into similarly higher levels of support for either the SNP or independence so far.
On a uniform swing, Thompson would only retain his seat if the SNP are at least 15 points ahead of Labour nationwide. Although there are still a few days left for the SNP’s national position to recover, it’s phenomenally improbable that there will be a surge on that scale.
READ MORE: I'm a leading doctor in Scotland – I trust the SNP on the NHS, not Labour
The latest constituency-level projections from polling companies confirm the problem – despite WeThink reporting the SNP are on course for a surprise national win, they still suggest that Thompson is currently losing to Labour by a margin of 49% to 30%. The Focaldata results, which are poorer for the SNP across the board, imply that the Midlothian contest is even more lopsided with Labour enjoying an advantage of 50% to 25%.
Realistically, Thompson’s main goal may be to ensure that his second-placed finish is strong enough to leave the SNP well-placed to recapture the seat once Starmer becomes an unpopular prime minister and the pendulum swings decisively against Labour once again.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel