NEW legislation that could bring in charges for single-use coffee cups, as well as fines for those who “deliberately contaminate” recycling, has been passed at Holyrood.
MSPs have approved by 116 votes to zero the Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill, which introduces a series of measures aimed at reducing waste and also ensuring households and businesses dispose of their rubbish in the correct way.
While this could see people issued with a fixed penalty notice for putting the wrong items in their bins, Climate Action Minister Gillian Martin sought to reassure Scots.
She said these would be used to deal with “repeat persistent offenders”, insisting it was “not for the people who want to do the right thing and have made a mistake”.
Instead, Martin said the fixed penalty notices would be for those who have “deliberately contaminated recycling waste”.
Among its measures, the legislation will ban the disposal of unsold goods, preventing companies from sending products which have not been bought to landfill, with ministers to be given the power to set local recycling targets.
Other parts of the bill could result in charges being brought in for single-use items such as coffee cups, while car and van drivers could be fined if anyone is caught littering from their vehicle.
Martin said there was a “real need to accelerate our efforts on the circular economy”, adding that the bill would “embed” thinking on this in the government.
“We’re all consumers, we must play our part in reducing waste,” she said.
“That’s why this bill is so far-reaching, it impacts us all from the goods we buy to what we put in our recycling bins.”
READ MORE: How can Scotland cut down on waste when it seems nothing is built to last?
Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater said the bill was a “significant step forward”, adding it would help bring about changes so it is “no longer acceptable to casually extract materials to make items that will be used only once or just a few times and then thrown away”.
Slater, who had been circular economy minister when the Greens were still in the Scottish Government, said the bill enabled ministers to introduce measures such as charges on single-use items.
She said: “The measure of success in this bill lies not simply in passing it, but in taking up the powers it conveys and putting in place practical actions.”
However both the Tories and Labour said the legislation could have been better.
Scottish Conservative MSP Maurice Golden said while his party backed the bill’s general principles, the legislation “lacks the ambition we need to build a sustainable economy and to see it thrive”.
The Tory said: “Even after a decade of trying, the SNP still haven’t managed to deliver on their 2013 household recycling target, and their ‘new’ approach is the same strategy they have been reusing for the past two years.”
He argued “bold and decisive action” was needed, calling on the Scottish Government to “take a more constructive approach to tackle this issue”.
Labour’s Sarah Boyack said: “I don’t think the bill is as good as it could have been.
“My personal view is I still think it is a missed opportunity, because the bill is more about recycling waste management than seizing the opportunity to deliver the circular economy our constituents, our businesses and our planet needs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel