LABOUR have been accused of having a “broken moral compass” after a senior figure refused to rule out sending asylum seekers back to Taliban-run Afghanistan.
The party’s shadow paymaster general Jonathan Ashworth insisted that the Tories’ Rwanda scheme would not work as a deterrent to prevent people trying to come to the UK on BBC Newsnight.
Instead, he said Labour are “going to send people back” to the countries from which they are fleeing.
But he then proceeded to not engage with host Victoria Derbyshire when she repeatedly asked whether Labour would look to get a return agreement with the Taliban and with the Iranian regime, given figures show most asylum seekers arriving in the UK are from Afghanistan and Iran.
After several attempts to get him to answer the question, he eventually said: “Well, you look at each one on its merits, obviously.”
READ MORE: Reform candidate stands by 'Putin is good Russian president' claim
Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman (below) described his comments as “abhorrent” and urged Labour to rule out the prospect of returns agreements with these regimes “immediately”.
She told The National: "The racist anti-migrant policies are one of the worst legacies of this Tory government, and many of us are concerned that Labour will keep the vast majority of them in place.
"The fact that they can't even bring themselves to rule out deporting refugees to a Taliban-run Afghanistan tells us everything we need to know about the party's broken moral compass and its disregard for the rights of some of the world's most vulnerable people.
"The Taliban is a vile regime with an appalling record. That's what every human rights group will say and is the reason Labour gave for joining the disastrous 20-year war in Afghanistan. Now they want us to treat the same regime as a legitimate government.
"If Labour wants to have any credibility on human rights and internationalism they will rule this out immediately and dismantle the hostile environment that has been built."
Nato left Afghanistan in 2021, quickly leading to the Taliban taking back power in the country.
The Taliban brought back bans on education for girls and laws stopping women from going to work.
The Taliban also banned women’s beauty salons, adding on laws that prevent women from being in public spaces like parks and gyms.
The SNP’s Stephen Flynn said that Labour were moving further and further towards a Reform-inspired position on immigration.
Former SNP MP Dr Philippa Whitford said the UK had treated people from Afghanistan appallingly, citing how the Ministry of Defence admitted earlier this month it was able to veto sanctuary applications from its Afghan counterparts to stop them coming to the UK.
READ MORE: Edinburgh U-turns on Taiwan friendship deal over China sanctions fear
Whitford said Ashworth’s comments did not convince her Labour were going to have an attitude any different to the Tories on immigration.
Asked what she thought of Ashworth’s comments, she told The National: “I think it’s terrifying.
“The UK has appalling let down people in Afghanistan, including people who have worked with the British Army in abandoning them to the Taliban, so having Labour being so soft and woolly on this language would suggest that they’re going to continue a similar approach.
“What we have seen even back in the 2019 election is Labour taking a much more anti-immigration stance.
“I’m not expecting a great change. They are triangulating the Tories on one policy after another.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel