THE City of Edinburgh Council has shelved plans for a new "friendship arrangement" with a Taiwanese city following fears it could harm relations with China.
The local authority was due to consider a five-year partnership to strengthen cultural and commercial links between the Scottish capital and Kaohsiung, but plans have been dropped from this week's council agenda.
Organisations including the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Airport and Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce warned the move could result in sanctions on the city and reduced trade, tourism and student numbers.
READ MORE: Why Taiwan is one of Scottish whisky’s biggest importers
A report also raised concerns that it could lead to an increased risk of cyber attack.
Taiwan considers itself an independent nation, and largely functions as one currently.
However, this view is not shared by China and in most other countries, including the US and UK, the island’s political status is contentious.
A report admitted the arrangement "does pose potential risks for the city’s relationship with China, but that these risks are difficult to quantify with confidence".
It added the current threat level to the council of a cyber-attack remained "very high" and signing the arrangement "could increase these risks".
Deal 'will bring about serious consequences'
Council leader Cammy Day (below), who has spearheaded efforts to strengthen relations between Edinburgh and Taiwan, visited Kaohsiung and Taipei on a Taiwanese government-funded trip last year.
In August he secured agreement from councillors to "work towards a memorandum of understanding between Taiwan and the appropriate city partners".
This has since changed to a "friendship arrangement" built on a "principle of mutual benefit".
This would seek to "strengthen commercial and innovation cooperation, enrich the cultural and artistic life of both cities".
Day said having taken on board the views of the business community and other partners they had decided "more discussion is required before taking this agreement forward".
He said: "We’ll continue this dialogue and report back to a future council meeting.
"In the meantime, I remain in no doubt that developing these types of relationships with progressive and open-minded cities like ours is absolutely the right thing to do for the people of Edinburgh."
READ MORE: Top diplomat calls for new Scottish trade office in Taiwan
China’s representative in Edinburgh told councillors he had "grave concerns" about a "sister city agreement between Edinburgh and cities from Taiwan".
In a letter sent earlier this month, consul general Zhang Biao wrote: "This is not a action simply to promote exchange and friendship, it is deeply related to the Taiwan question and will bring about serious consequences.
"The Chinese government firmly opposes counties that have diplomatic ties with China to conduct official exchanges with Taiwan in any form, including signing agreement with sovereign implications or of an official nature."
Biao said the council signing a friendship arrangement with Taiwan "will hurt the feeling of the Chinese people and bring about serious consequences to our bilateral relations, which we do not want to see".
He added: "Surely Edinburgh would benefit little but lose a lot from such action."
Letters of support were received from the Kaohsiung City Government, the Taipei Representative Office in the UK and the Scotland Taiwanese Association.
But several organisations urged the council not to sign the arrangement:
- Edinburgh Airport feared it could harm work to increase the number of direct flights to China.
- Essential Edinburgh said there could be sanctions on the city "with consequential impact on future student and visitor numbers from China".
- Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce emphasised the "success of recent trade missions and the importance of maintaining strong relationships with both Taiwan and China".
- Edinburgh Hotels Association highlighted the "importance of Chinese visitors and students to Edinburgh's businesses and tourism economy".
- And the University of Edinburgh raised "risks associated with the general denigration of relationships with partner bodies in China if the proposed formal arrangement proceeds".
A spokesman for Edinburgh Airport said the council's draft report had a lack of detail about the "potential impact of the risks that were alluded to".
"A range of things were mentioned, such as the current relationship with China and the benefits it brings, and we felt it would be wise for all of us to better understand the potential extent of the risks involved to allow all of us to make a fully informed decision," he said.
Conservative group leader Iain Whyte said the local authority should focus on "improving the vital local services it provides rather than dabbling ineffectually in international politics".
He added: "It’s obvious that this needed far more thought before being brought forward as a formal proposal.
"The pause is helpful as it will allow the council to engage more widely should any proposal returns.
"It’s time to focus on Edinburgh people’s priorities."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel