THE SNP’s adoption of the principle of a wellbeing pension in their manifesto has been welcomed by campaigners who believe it will boost the independence vote.
They point out that the cost of living crisis, coupled with rampant inflation and a state pension system that is not up to scratch has left an estimated 1.7 million pensioners below the poverty line.
Responding to criticism that the state pension was not enough to cover the basic costs of living, the UK Government introduced a “Newly Retired State Pension”, in April 2016.
READ MORE: Football fans' cancer charity 'has given me my life back'
However, at £221.20 a week, it is still not enough to cover the basic costs of living and only applies to those who retired after that date.
It means that more than 80% of pensioners are still on the old state pension of £169.50 – one of the worst in the developed world. Poorer pensioners can claim means-tested benefits to boost it to £218.15 per week but that is still under the amount calculated by Scotianomics, the wellbeing economy think tank, to cover basic living costs.
The idea of a wellbeing pension would cover the basic costs of living and is calculated at £241.50 per week in 2024 – it’s just enough to live with dignity and no more and the think tank stresses it shouldn’t be the end goal. It is part of the concept of a wellbeing economy based on the needs of the nation rather than neo-liberalism and “trickle-down economics”.
A campaign for a wellbeing pension has been run for several years by grassroots independence movement Believe in Scotland and 10,000 leaflets explaining what it means have been delivered by activists to households across the country.
Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp (below) of Believe in Scotland said polling had shown it could increase the independence vote to more than 60%.
“Several times we have asked the voters if they are in favour of independence and polled around 48% Yes, but when we ask how people would vote if the Scottish Government put a wellbeing economy and paying a wellbeing pension at the heart of their case for independence, it goes to 61-62%, so this is key,” he said.
MacIntyre-Kemp added that it was “significant” that the SNP had adopted the concept in their manifesto.
READ MORE: Moyna Flannigan returns to her roots to aid Edinburgh Collective
“Independence activists across Scotland can now look people in the eye and say that an independent Scotland will have better pensions and will end pensioner poverty so that is a significant move,” he said.
“Until now, the SNP have not actually had a policy that says pensions will be raised so this is a breakthrough. I can’t think of another policy that has come from the grassroots independence movement that has had such an impact.
“The current state pension is nowhere near enough to live with dignity. That should be a fundamental baseline but consecutive Westminster governments, both Tory and Labour, have kept pensions low specifically to boost the City of London because if pensions are low, middle-class people buy private pensions,” MacIntyre-Kemp added.
“We need to base our new Wellbeing Economic approach in Scotland on the needs of the people of our nation, not the needs of big corporates in the City of London.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel