THREE pro-Palestine protesters have been found guilty of public order offences after a demonstration outside the house of Keir Starmer.
Leonorah Ward, 21, of Leeds, Zosia Lewis, 23, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and Daniel Formentin, 24, of Leeds, hung a banner outside the Labour leader's London house that read, “Starmer stop the killing”, surrounded by red handprints, on April 9.
They also placed four rows of children’s shoes in front of the property to signify the children killed in Gaza.
The trio were representing the group Youth Demand, which describes itself as a “new youth resistance campaign fighting for an end to genocide”.
READ MORE: Just Stop Oil activists spray Stonehenge with orange paint
They were convicted of public order offences under Section 42 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, and with breaching court bail after a one-day trial at Westminster Magistrates’ Court.
District Judge Michael Snow said: “The person who resides here is a senior politician. In the last two years, two Members of Parliament have been murdered.”
Giving evidence at the trial, Keir’s wife Victoria said she felt “a bit sick” when she encountered the trio at her home, and drove around the corner in her car.
“I felt apprehensive and uncomfortable,” she added.
Asked by Andrew Morris, defending, if she knew it was a “peaceful protest”, Victoria Starmer said: “It would look like a peaceful protest if it hadn’t been outside my home.”
A police sergeant who responded to the demonstration told the court that holding the protest outside somebody’s house – instead of outside the House of Commons or Starmer’s offices – was “inappropriate”.
“I did not know if they were going to be there 10 minutes or a day,” Sgt Mark Upsdale said.
Section 42 powers cover the harassment of a person at their home address if an officer suspects it is causing alarm or distress to the occupant.
Formentin told the court he targeted Starmer because he believed the Labour leader was “not accurately representing the country” over the conflict.
“There is an overwhelming sense that young people in this country do want a ceasefire in Palestine,” he claimed.
Marketing consultant Formentin, who wore a keffiyeh pattern scarf, added: “We had no plans to confront anyone."
Delivering his verdict, Judge Snow said the trio had been directed to leave the premises but had “continued” regardless.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel