LABOUR are continuing the “interference in devolution” with a promise of new spending powers for the Scotland Office, John Swinney has insisted.
The First Minister said Labour’s plans are a “democratic outrage”, but he added he will engage with any future UK government if it offers to talk.
He was responding to Labour’s shadow Scottish secretary Ian Murray, who said he will try to work with the SNP-run Scottish Government in exercising the new powers if he becomes a minister after July 4.
Murray said he is seeking to work together but “it takes two to tango”.
READ MORE: IFS: SNP 'right that rejoining EU could bring £30bn boost to revenue'
Swinney was asked about the comments as he launched the SNP’s manifesto in Edinburgh on Wednesday.
The First Minister told the PA news agency: “The Scotland Act was constructed to give the Scottish Parliament power over a whole range of different areas.
“It wasn’t constructed to allow the UK Government to interfere, in fact it was the exact opposite.”
He said Murray’s comments represent “a continuation of the interference in devolution which the Conservatives have brought forward since Brexit”.
The First Minister continued: “It’s a democratic outrage.
“The Labour Party needs to decide whether they’re either going to protect devolution or continue the Tory attack on devolution.
“By the form of the Labour Party on austerity and other issues, they’re going to continue the attack on devolution.”
READ MORE: John Swinney: SNP losing seats would not affect independence mandate
Swinney went on to say he will “happily engage with a United Kingdom government” if he is offered talks.
Labour’s proposals involve spending what is currently levelling up money through the Scotland Office, turning it into a spending department.
At the weekend, Murray said this would be used to tackle poverty and encourage growth north of the border.
He said: “I can assure you that any Scotland Office that I run will be solely focused on delivering for the Scottish people and that means we’ve got to work closely together.
“Of course, it takes two to tango, they’ve got to also decide they want to dance.
“The Scotland Office will be turned into a spending department, we’ve got money to spend too.
“The best bang for your buck is to work together to spend that money in local communities to create jobs and eradicate poverty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel