A TACTICAL voting guide has been blasted by critics as having a pro-Labour bias.
Think tank Best for Britain launched a tactical voting guide on Monday which urged voters in SNP constituencies across Scotland to vote Labour – despite the organisation saying it wanted more “pro-European” MPs in Westminster.
Labour have said they'll never seek to take the UK back into the EU, while the SNP are explicitly in favour of an independent Scotland in the bloc.
The voting guide, which has the stated aims of getting the Conservatives out and increasing pro-EU sentiment in Parliament, urges voters in many SNP seats to back Labour.
It urges Scots to back Labour in 28 seats across the country – most currently held by the SNP.
(Image: UK Parliament/Maria Unger)
In some held by the SNP, such as Westminster leader Stephen Flynn’s (above) Aberdeen South seat, people are urged to “vote with your heart”.
While the voting guide urges voters in Edinburgh to back Labour, with the exception of the LibDem seat Edinburgh West, people in shadow Scotland secretary Ian Murray’s (below) seat which has been Labour since 1987 are also told to “vote with your heart”.
READ MORE: Rachel Reeves tells top bankers 'your fingerprints are all over Labour manifesto'
Voters are urged to vote SNP in seats currently held or nominally held by the Tories, except for East Kilbride, where they are told to vote Labour.
In Bathgate and Linlithgow, voters are told to back Labour, despite the party coming a distant third place in the 2019 election under slightly different boundaries.
The guide drew criticism on Twitter/X, with Glasgow South Greens candidate Niall Christie saying its description that no parties were “fighting hard here” was “insulting”. He added: “Vote for your futures, don’t vote in another right-wing government with Labour.”
READ MORE: 'Scottish Labour will be mortified': Tony Blair weighs in on independence
Another user saying it was a “Fundamentally flawed tool as it favours Labour in Scottish constituencies where SNP are the clear anti-Tory favourites”.
One user added: “Convenient for England have absolutely disgraced themselves here. Vote tactically not to get the Tories out but to get their chosen ones in. I've rarely been this disappointed or felt more stupid for giving complete charlatans the time of day.”
Others said the firm’s decision to back Labour despite the SNP being better placed to beat the Tories in many seats in Scotland was a “political choice rather than a tactical choice”.
A spokesperson for Best for Britain said: “Since our foundation, Best for Britain has campaigned for closer EU-UK ties and the next UK Government will have the unprecedented opportunity, and unenviable responsibility, to rebuild UK-EU relations after over a decade of Eurosceptic Conservative misrule.
“As the most pro-European nation in the UK, we want the Scottish electorate to be heard both on opposition and government benches should Labour win the next election. We want people within the next government and outside it pushing for improvements to the Tories’ damaging Brexit deal.
“That is why, based on the most up-to-date MRP polling, constituency level insights and expert analysis, we recommend people vote Labour, SNP and LibDem in Scotland and are also advising people to vote Green in three other constituencies in England.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel