THE European Court of Justice has ordered Hungary to pay a fine of 200 million euros (£168.7 million) and a further one million euros (£843,500) per day of delay for failing to comply with the bloc’s asylum rules.
The court ruled in December 2020 that Hungary had failed to abide by the bloc’s policies for granting international protection and returning illegal migrants.
The European Commission, the bloc’s executive arm, launched a new judicial action seeking financial sanctions.
Hungary’s anti-immigrant government has taken a hard line on people entering the country since well over a million people entered Europe in 2015, most of them fleeing conflict in Syria.
READ MORE: Labour set to announce major spending cuts if party gains power
It erected border fences and forcefully tried to stop many from entering.
The court said in a statement on Thursday: “In its judgment, the court holds that Hungary has not taken the measures necessary to comply with the 2020 judgment.
“That failure, which consists in deliberately avoiding the application of a common EU policy as a whole, constitutes an unprecedented and extremely serious infringement of EU law.”
After the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, the government pushed through a law forcing people seeking international protection to travel to Belgrade or Kyiv to apply for a travel permit at its embassies there to enter Hungary.
Only once back could they file their applications.
The European Commission took Hungary to the European Court of Justice over the law, insisting that the country had failed to fulfil its obligations under the 27-nation bloc's rules.
The rules oblige all member countries to have common procedures for granting asylum.
People have the right to apply for asylum or other forms of international protection if they fear for their safety in their home countries or face the prospect of persecution based on their race, religion, ethnic background, gender or other discrimination.
A spokesman for the court said the additional penalty of one million euros (£843,500) per day applies with immediate effect.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel