THE BBC has edited Sunday’s episode of its flagship politics show with Laura Kuenssberg for viewers on iPlayer after a segment with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.
People looking to catch up on the June 9 broadcast, which featured Farage as well as Tory Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride and SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn, will instead see an updated version of the episode.
A notice on iPlayer makes clear that the “programme has been edited, since broadcast, for editorial compliance reasons” but does not expand on those reasons for the changes.
An update on the BBC’s corrections and clarifications page states that the episode of Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg was edited after broadcast specifically due to the segment which included Farage.
In the original broadcast, Farage was shown standing on Clacton Pier, in the Clacton constituency in which he is standing to become an MP.
However, on the iPlayer version, the background of the shots of Farage has been almost completely blurred out.
The BBC said: “An interview with Nigel Farage gave too much visual prominence to the constituency in which he is standing for election, in a way which is not in line with our editorial guidelines.
“We have made edits and visual adjustments to the iPlayer edition of the programme, including removing verbal references to the constituency.
READ MORE: Tory candidate set to replace Douglas Ross as Highland MSP lives in London
“The interview did not discuss constituency issues and we have made no edits to Mr Farage’s words.
“The programme is aiming to interview the leaders of all the larger parties during the campaign.”
While the exact reasoning for the decision remains unclear, the BBC’s draft editorial guidelines for the General Election period suggest that due to the prominence of Clacton during Farage’s appearance, other candidates in Clacton should have been offered a chance to speak.
The draft guidance states: “Reports or debates about a specific electoral area should give due weight to candidates who have demonstrated substantial electoral support in that area …
“This means that if any candidate takes part in an item about a specific electoral area, then these other candidates should also be offered the opportunity to take part, or be given a similar opportunity across a series of reports.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel