PATRICK Harvie has said he will “probably” always support independence – as he was grilled on whether the Greens would split the independence vote at the election.
The Scottish Greens co-leader defended past comments by his colleague Lorna Slater (below), who had said the constitutional question was not a “red line” for working with Labour on progressive issues.
But with the Greens and Alba fielding candidates against the SNP at the upcoming General Election, both parties are now facing questions over whether this will help or hinder the independence cause.
Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday Show, Harvie was asked whether he believed people should vote Green “even if that would push their constituency into Unionist hands”.
He replied: “I’m really absolutely firm in my view that an election is an opportunity for the voters to choose and they have to be given the widest range of choices available to them. I’m certainly an independence supporter, I think I probably always will be.”
READ MORE: Bombshell analysis shows what Labour's secret austerity plan could buy Scotland
Host Martin Geissler (below) then queried him over Slater’s previous comments, which Harvie argued had been n taken “out of context”.
(Image: BBC)
He added: “She was being asked about if there was a future Labour government, would we refuse to cooperate with them on issues because of independence.
“And of couse, if there was a future Labour government, if they were going to implement something like rent controls in the private rented sector, we would work with them to achieve that.”
Asked if he would be happy to see SNP seats fall to Labour or the Tories if people migrated to the Greens, Harvie said: “I am happy to see every Green vote in every ballot box that we can achieve, if we can persuade voters to vote like their future depends on it because it really, really does.
“The next UK Government, we know it’s going to be a Labour government, we know it’s going to have a really substantial majority unless something utterly dramatic happens in the opinion polls in the next couple of weeks.
“The real danger is that we’ll see a change of government, but not a change of politics. A change of direction is needed in the country and that’s not going to be achieved by a Labour government that’s committed to Tory fiscal rules.”
But later in the programme the Greens were accused of not being “a serious independence party”.
READ MORE: Key battleground seat engulfed in sectarianism row
Alba leader Alex Salmond (below) insisted that voting Alba would not split the independence vote but “mobilise” it.
He said: “The SNP are not campaigning on independence, they are avowedly not campaigning on independence. And nor do I believe the Greens are a serious independence party.”
Salmond added that while he believed some SNP supporters were drifting to Labour, more would stay at home.
He said: “They’re not going to vote, they’re disillusioned, they’re disenfranchised. Alba’s appeal is to that disenfranchised 15-20%. We want people, instead of sitting at home to get out and vote for Alba, instead of voting for the Unionist Labour Party, get out an vote for Alba. That’s our appeal.”
Salmond added: “We’re going to mobilise the independence vote, not split it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel