SCOTTISH Tory leader Douglas Ross has been accused of using his MP expenses to travel while working as an assistant referee while his team covered it up.
According to the Sunday Mail Ross’s team have identified 28 claims he made to Westminister while carrying out work as a football referee after he had already been confronted about possible rule-breaking.
The findings have only recently come to light after the fallout over Ross replacing his sick colleague David Duguid to stand in his constituency of Banff and Buchan last week.
A senior Tory source revealed to the Sunday Mail the team discussed the travel claims when contacted by journalists but hoped nobody would pick them up.
READ MORE: Analysis shows what Labour's cuts plans could buy for Scotland
Ross apparently billed the taxpayer for flights between London to Glasgow and Edinburgh, where he was working as an SFA linesman.
Only travel from an MP’s declared home airport, which in Ross’s case who was the MP for Moray would be Inverness or Aberdeen, can be claimed as constituency travel.
The expense watchdog, Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA), were led to believe that Ross was returning to his Moray constituency.
However, the claims were all wrongly classed as “London-constituency” with IPSA.
Ross’s team identified the 28 expenses where he wrongly used parliamentary-funded travel for his refereeing work after he was first asked questions about the expenses by journalists in 2021.
His team were said to have identified multiple cases where the Scottish Tory leader had combined parliamentary travel with linesman work or claims for parking while refereeing for the SFA on expenses.
According to reports, Ross’s team back in November 2021 identified dozens of cases like a £58 parking claim at Inverness airport in July 2018 while parliament was in recess.
He also claimed £43 in rail travel from Heathrow to central London the day after he refereed a match in Iceland.
In October 2019, he claimed for a flight from London to Glasgow and for £109 parking with NCP car parks, and on November 1, 2020, he claimed £48.99 for parking the day he refereed a Celtic game.
Other travel outside flying, like travelling by train, must be classed as a diverted journey if it does not cost more and MPs must provide detailed notes alongside every claim to explain why it their travel was diverted.
According to the Sunday Mail, a party insider said: “The latest antics from Douglas are a disgrace and he should be ashamed of himself. He has always wanted to stay at Westminster and he’s completely screwed over a hard-working colleague to get there. Many of us are disgusted with it.”
Ross was also one of MSP Michael Matheson's strongest critics, as he said the former SNP Health secretary should be shown a “red card” after he was suspended for incorrectly claiming £11,000 on expenses for a phone bill while on holiday.
When asked by The National about the reported claims Ross said: “I have only ever claimed expenses related to my role as a member of parliament and the costs of getting me to and from Westminster.
“These have all been agreed by IPSA, the independent body that oversees MPs expenses, but I would have no issue with them being scrutinised again.”
The SNP has called for urgent clarity on the matter and would also like to see further scrutiny on Ross's expenses.
They said: “This revelation will come as no surprise after the recent shameful behaviour of Douglas Ross, however further scrutiny is clearly needed.
“He needs to urgently explain whether he has been using taxpayer money to pay his expenses for his third job as a linesman.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel