THE Scottish Greens have said they want an annual wealth tax on the super-rich which could raise £70 billion a year for public services.
The party’s manifesto, which is set to be published in the coming weeks, will include a commitment to an annual wealth tax on the wealthiest 1% of households in the UK.
The tax would affect households with assets worth £3.4 million and above.
The Party says the tax rate would rise incrementally starting at 1% and then rise to 5% for those worth £5.7m, then 10% for people with £18.2m.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens warn SNP against U-turn on oil and gas exploration
According to the Greens analysis from the University of Greenwich said it would raise more than £70bn and potentially up to £130bn which they say could go towards funding public services like the NHS.
The party’s co-leader, Lorna Slater, said households across the UK have felt the crippling effects of the cost-of-living crisis as the super-rich has continued to become wealthier and it is a glaring inequality.
She said: “The last few years have been really tough for millions of families across the UK. People have struggled with sky high bills, soaring costs and stagnating wages.
“Yet, for the super wealthy things have never been better. They have continued to get richer and richer while inequality has gotten worse and worse.
“There is more than enough money in the UK to ensure that everyone can grow up with warmth and security, but so much of it is being hoarded by a tiny number of extremely wealthy people who don’t need it.
“A fair income tax system is important, but it misses the vast majority of the money being accumulated by the super-rich. That is why it is so crucial that we tax their overall wealth.
“Over the weeks ahead every party will make big promises about what they will do in power. Only the Scottish Greens are being honest enough about how we would fund it and who would pay for it.”
Slater added: “The Scottish Greens have already delivered by far the fairest and most progressive income tax system anywhere in the UK, raising an extra £1.5 billion for public services every year.
“By asking the people with the most to pay a little bit more, we have delivered vital funds to support our NHS and schools, and the services we all rely on. With those services under so much pressure though we must go further, and it is right that the very wealthiest in our society are the ones to fund it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel