THERE is currently “no strong evidence” that scrapping peak rail fares has been effective at getting more people to use the train, according to interim analysis of the Scottish Government’s pilot scheme.
The policy was announced last year and due to expire in the spring, but has since been extended to the end of September, meaning rail passengers can travel for the same price regardless of the time of day.
Analysis by Transport Scotland showed a bounce in the first three months of the pilot, but the response since the turn of the year – up to May 13 – was “muted”.
The publication of the analysis was announced by Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop during an appearance at the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee at Holyrood, where she urged more people to use the trains because the Scottish Government was keen to extend the pilot.
READ MORE: UK Government gives £110,000 contract to TV debate coach
In the first three months of the pilot, demand increased by 3.95%, but between the beginning of the policy and May 13, demand had dropped by 3.29%.
However, due to the pandemic, the analysis noted ScotRail passenger numbers were on the rise and it was “challenging to extrapolate the impact of the pilot”.
“Whilst the initial impact of the Pilot has been found to be somewhat positive, the impact on rail journeys since the start of 2024 is significantly less pronounced and there is currently no strong evidence of its effectiveness in achieving mode shift, other than helping with cost-of-living issues for existing users,” the document said.
“Analytical work is progressing, and a final evaluation will be produced in time for a decision to be made on whether the trial should be made permanent.”
Fiona Hyslop said the interim results of the pilot weren't as convincing as she had hoped
The analysis also showed those regularly using rail services were saving money as a result.
In a survey, 38% of existing rail users – which made up around one third of the 1476 respondents – said they had paid less, with those who usually buy tickets which can be used at peak or off-peak times saving on average £10 per week.
The initial budget for the policy was £40 million, which the analysis said has not been exceeded, but the current spend was not outlined.
Hyslop has urged more people to get on the trains to ensure the pilot results in the policy being made permanent.
READ MORE: How scientists confirmed authenticity of Stone of Destiny fragment
“In order to prove that this is to be a success, we really need more people to choose rail,” she told the committee.
“I’ve encouraged everybody who has benefited from those reduced fares to encourage more of their work colleagues, their neighbours, their friends to use it.
“We are supportive of the policy, we would like to see it extended, but I think taking a very objective view of the figures that we have to date, I don’t think it’s as convincing as I would have liked it to have been.
“But we have to face the reality of where we are.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel