QUESTIONS over the number of Orange Order marches held in Glasgow over the last year have been raised at a city council committee meeting.
Between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024, there were a total of 264 public processions held in Glasgow compared to 233 between April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023.
A report presented to members of the well-being committee highlighted that during that time there were 135 Orange Order marches, while 24 were organised by Apprentice Boys of Derry and 10 by the Black Institute, while there were seven Republican Marches, two trade union marches, eight bands, 11 funerals and 67 “other” processions took place across the city.
READ MORE: John Swinney blasts Tory 'strategy to undermine Scottish Parliament'
During the meeting, members were reminded that the legal and administrative process for dealing with public processions is set out in Part V of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982.
It states that anyone organising a procession in Glasgow must notify the council at least 28 days prior to the date on which the procession is due to take place.
After receiving the notification, the council can either agree to the procession taking place as intended or attach conditions such as making changes to the start time or the proposed route.
Only under very limited circumstances would they prohibit the procession.
Under Part V of the 1982 Act, when deciding if it’s necessary to stop the march or impose conditions, the local authority must take into consideration public safety, public order, damage to property and disruption to the life of the community.
READ MORE: Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber: Smart money is on SNP despite polls
During the meeting, Irene Louden, co-opted committee member, said: “On the processions, of those which were applied for last year, how many were actually permitted?
“It just seems that the number of orange order marches is disproportionately excessive. Why are so many permitted?”
A council officer confirmed that over the period of 2023/24 there were no processions prohibited in terms of the statistics.
They said: “It would not be appropriate to comment on whether they are excessive or not but each notification is dealt with on its own merit and dealt with under the consideration of part V of the Act.
“Each notification has to be considered on its own merits.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel