PLANS to transform a vacant gap site in Kirkcaldy are set to move forward after councillors went against the planning authority’s recommendation, and gave it the go-ahead.
The decision was made at this week’s meeting of Fife Council’s West and Central planning committee.
The £2.5 million plans from Castlecreoft and Stephens the Bakers will transform an empty site in Kirkcaldy into a bakery shop, business units and storage facilities.
READ MORE: John Swinney blasts Tory 'strategy to undermine Scottish Parliament'
The Hendry Road and Hayfield Industrial Estate site has been vacant for two decades, and developers have said the plans could create up to 100 jobs.
Planners wanted to refuse the application because they said the bakery development was not appropriate as it would introduce retail onto a site which is designated as employment land. According to planners, it would also “likely impact” on the shopping area it nearby Templehall.
Generally speaking, employment land is allocated for industry, business and office use, storage and distribution, business parks and specialist technology parks.
Crucially, it does not include retail uses.
“The proposed bakery unit is in conflict. Therefore the development as a whole conflicts with the National Planning Framework and the local development plan due to loss of employment land,” councillors were told.
“It’s accepted that the development would bring benefits in terms of re-use of vacant land as well as employment and training opportunities, but they don’t outweigh the conflict with the development plan.”
However, committee convener David Barrat (SNP for Inverkeithing and Dalgety Bay) questioned whether refusing the entire application due to the bakery plans was proportionate.
“I think this is quite finely balanced and I could go either way on this one,” he said. “It’s contrary in terms of one of the uses, but it’s a small proportion of the overall application.
Is it proportionate to refuse the application on that alone when Fife Council’s Economic Development team have been consulted and say the development would create employment use and be considered a positive for jobs and investment?”
Councillor Lesley Backhouse (SNP for Burntisland, Kinghorn and Western Kirkcaldy) agreed. She said the decision was on a “finely edged knife”.
“We need to be getting our vacant land working and getting employment onto it. The development would provide employment and other opportunities. I’d like to propose that we accept this application,” she added.
Councillor John Beare (SNP for Glenrothes North, Leslie and Markinch) was the sole dissenting voice. He sided with planners, asking that the application be refused.
“I don’t accept the logic that we must get vacant land working at apparently no expense,” he said.
“I’m also very mindful of displacement from one retail centre to another, particularly in Kirkcaldy.”
READ MORE: SNP: Keir Starmer pledge to cut migration will directly harm Scotland
He added: “Those who proposed the Morrisons said there would be no impact on town centre and that clearly didn’t work out.”
Had the bakery not been part of the proposal, Cllr Beare theorised that the plans would have “sailed through” the process, but as it stood he wanted to see the plans refused.
However, he was the only councillor in favour of refusing as the committee voted to approve the application.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here