LABOUR veteran Diane Abbott has accused Keir Starmer of an “appalling” cull of left-wingers as she faces continued uncertainty about her own political future.
Abbott said she wanted to fight to retain her seat “as long as it is possible” but she criticised decisions made by Labour to exclude candidates from the party left.
Starmer has insisted no decision has yet been taken about whether Abbott – who in 1987 became the first black woman elected to Parliament – would be allowed to defend her Hackney North and Stoke Newington seat.
The party's deputy leader Angela Rayner told The Guardian however she doesn't think "there's any reason" why Abbott (below) should not be able to stand and said the row over her future was "not a great look".
But Lloyd Russell-Moyle, who was MP for Brighton Kemptown, said Labour has suspended him over what he called a “vexatious and politically motivated complaint”, and that he cannot stand under the Labour banner at the election.
And Faiza Shaheen said she was in a “state of shock” after not being endorsed as the Labour candidate for Chingford and Woodford Green in outer London.
In response, Abbott said: “Appalling. Whose clever idea has it been to have a cull of left wingers?”
Shaheen was blocked after liking a series of social media posts on Twitter/X that allegedly downplayed accusations of antisemitism.
READ MORE: Labour select candidate who said smuggler gangs should be 'shipped to Scotland'
She told BBC’s Newsnight: “On top of Gaza, on top of Diane Abbott and now this to me, when there’s such clear double standards of how other people have been treated when stuff has happened […] what message are you sending my community?
"What message are you sending the black community?”
The Labour Muslim Network said the treatment of Shaheen was “unacceptable”.
Shadow cabinet minister Darren Jones (below) denied there had been a “purge” of the left, telling Times Radio: “I don’t think that’s true.
"I mean, there are many colleagues of mine in the parliamentary Labour Party who would define themselves as being on the left who are endorsed Labour Party candidates standing in their constituency.”
A member of Labour’s ruling national executive committee (NEC) said ultimately it would be a decision for Starmer whether Abbott was allowed to defend her seat. However, Starmer has said it is for the NEC to decide.
Abbott had the Labour whip suspended in April 2023 pending an investigation after she suggested Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice but not racism.
The whip was restored on Tuesday, but Abbott said she was “dismayed” by reports that she could be barred as a candidate.
Mish Rahman told Times Radio: “Keir Starmer hides behind technicalities. He’s been hiding behind the independent process technicality for a while when actually, as we’ve now discovered, the independent process ended in December.
“Now he’s hiding behind the NEC.”
READ MORE: Labour condemned as candidate 'not endorsed' in row over social media posts
Rahman said the NEC “will rubber stamp” a list of candidates during the General Election process, but claimed “it will be the leadership’s decision” whether to include Abbott on the list, because the leadership “holds a majority on the NEC”.
He added: “So when Keir Starmer says, ‘oh, the NEC will decide’, at the end of the day, it’s more lawyer talk. It’s him and his action which will actually decide whether Diane Abbott is a Labour MP or not.”
Labour’s General Election campaign has been overshadowed by the internal chaos over selections.
Russell-Moyle said he was “gutted” after receiving an “administrative suspension letter” and being told he could not stand as a Labour candidate.
In a statement sent to the PA news agency, he said: “Someone (who remains anonymous to me) has made what I believe to be a vexatious and politically motivated complaint about my behaviour eight years ago. This is a false allegation that I dispute totally and I believe it was designed to disrupt this election.
READ MORE: Nicki Minaj wears a Saltire and performs Scottish classic in Glasgow
“There isn’t enough time to defend myself as these processes within the party take too long, so the party have told me that I will not be eligible to be a candidate at the next election.”
A Labour Party spokesperson said: “The Labour Party takes all complaints extremely seriously and they are fully investigated in line with our rules and procedures, and any appropriate disciplinary action is taken.”
Other decisions made on candidates include Luke Akehurst, an influential figure on the Labour right, being selected in North Durham, a safe seat.
Akehurst is a pro-Israel lobbyist and the director of the pressure group We Believe in Israel and is a member of Labour's ruling NEC.
Josh Simons (above), director of the Labour Together group which has backed Starmer, was selected in Makerfield in Lancashire.
Earlier this year he apologised after suggesting that people-smuggling gangs could be put on a barge and “shipped to the north of Scotland”, adding: “Who cares?”.
SNP candidate for Glasgow North Alison Thewliss said: “Mr Simons’s comments were a disgrace – and the breathtaking arrogance they display to Scotland is a hallmark of Starmer’s arrogant leadership.”
Starmer is on Thursday campaigning alongside Welsh First Minister Vaughan Gething, who is facing his own difficulties including a no-confidence motion due to be debated next week in the Senedd.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel