“I SPENT 22 years in the army. It ain’t gonna work.”
“I don’t want to die for Rishi Sunak, to be honest I don’t think any 18-year-old in this country wants to do that.”
“They must be desperate if they’re going to start sending children to war.”
Those were just some of the less expletive-laden responses The National was given when it asked the people of Glasgow for their views on Conservative plans to bring in conscription if they win the General Election.
READ MORE: 'Scandal': SNP pan Tory plan to pay for conscription with Brexit replacement funding
That is obviously a pretty massive “if”, given that Rishi Sunak’s party are trailing Labour in the polls by more than 20 points.
But the Tories’ announcement has started a conversation – and the idea wasn’t unanimously derided.
Some people on the streets of Glasgow, almost exclusively older ones, thought that the idea had some merit. There was a general feeling that young people need more options and more structure, and national service may give that to them.
However, even where the proposals found support, they were seen as “wrong-headed”.
One person said they would support a more civic-minded form of national service, with a focus on infrastructure rather than replacing trained armed forces personnel with freshly graduated schoolchildren.
Among younger people however, the consensus was unanimous. The idea was seen as a “desperate” attempt from the Conservatives to play to their voter base at young people’s expense.
“They sort of think the under-25s are all these woke, non-binary wimps, and yet they want an army of them? It doesn’t make sense to me,” one person quipped.
Others suggested the idea had not been thought through, questioning how it could be both mandatory and not legally enforced – or why young people would want to get involved in service for a state which is increasingly stripping back what it offers in return.
Time will tell whether the Tories’ have any more bright ideas up their sleeves before the General Election rolls around.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel