A NUMBER of Scottish Labour MSPs have backed Humza Yousaf’s Holyrood motion regarding the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting an arrest warrant for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Netanyahu – along with his defence minister Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders – is accused of perpetrating war crimes in Gaza by ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan.
The former first minister has submitted a motion to the Scottish Parliament calling on MSPs to recognise the “seriousness” of the alleged crimes and note that the ICC must be allowed to carry out its work “unimpeded and without intimidation or threat of sanction”.
READ MORE: Alba candidate threatened with fine by Inverclyde Council over banners
The motion – which also states that “no one is above the law” and expresses concern at the UK Government opposing the actions of the ICC – has been backed by several Scottish Labour MSPs.
Foysol Choudhury, Monica Lennon, Richard Leonard, Paul Sweeney, and Alex Rowley have all put their name to it.
It comes despite Labour leader Keir Starmer remaining silent on the issue.
Starmer has still not released a statement on the ICC requests for arrest warrants, more than two days after the news first broke.
Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
Humza Yousaf’s full motion reads:
“That the Parliament notes what it sees as the significant development from International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor, Karim Khan KC, to apply for arrest warrants against leaders of the Israeli government and leaders of Hamas; recognises what it considers to be the seriousness of the reported alleged crimes, including murder, rape, starvation and torture; believes that the ICC must be allowed to carry out its work unimpeded and without intimidation or threat of sanction; further believes that there must be equal application of the law, and that no one is above the law, regardless of whether they are state or non-state actors; expresses its concern at the UK Government opposing the actions of the ICC; demands that arms sales to Israel are immediately halted by the UK Government, and continues to call for all hostages to be released, and for an immediate ceasefire to be agreed to.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here