SOME SNP MSPs are “active climate deniers” and a shift rightwards from the party will present the Greens with an electoral opportunity, Lorna Slater has said.
Speaking to The National in a wide-ranging interview which will be published more fully on Sunday, the Green co-leader spoke about the future of her party and Scottish politics in general after the end of the Bute House Agreement.
The deal between the SNP and Greens cemented a majority in the Holyrood Parliament for the Scottish Government, but was abruptly ended by Humza Yousaf in late April, a decision which precipitated his own downfall.
Slater and her Green co-leader Patrick Harvie were both removed from Government, and their concern is that climate policies could be first on the chopping block for a new SNP minority government looking to make savings.
READ MORE: 'Menacing' Alister Jack kept Scottish nuclear plans a secret, John Swinney says
“We're out," Slater said. “So we're all waiting to see what this new government is going to prioritise”.
“Of course, as Scottish Greens, we're really worried that it means a climate climbdown, a roll back on everything from heat and buildings, reducing the emissions from Scotland's homes by making them warmer and better insulated, all the way to things like the Nature Restoration Fund and the new National Park.
“How much is going to get delayed, underfunded, under-resourced, watered down? That's really worrying.”
Slater, who was a project lead for the renewable energy firm Orbital before her election to parliament, said that investment in green policies was also investment in the economy.
READ MORE: Scotland has 'lion's share' of world's tidal energy potential – and chance to use it
She warned: “Countries who delay their transition, countries who slow down, will find themselves behind.
“The investment in things like electric vehicles and manufacturing, infrastructure, wind turbines, the infrastructure that goes with that, the supply chains, green hydrogen, will go to those countries who move first.
“The slow will lose out and find themselves buying equipment from those countries who moved fastest.
“That's the risk of watering this stuff down. This has long-term implications for our economy as well.”
Slater (above) said that there had been a “consensus” in the Scottish Parliament when climate change targets had been brought in, but that had “fractured” in more recent years.
“Although the Bute House Agreement gave us a pro-independence majority government, it's clear that it didn't actually have a pro-climate-action majority,” she said.
“There are enough SNP backbenchers who aren't interested in climate action, who are in some cases active climate deniers, that simply the maths didn't work out."
Though Slater did not name names, the Greens have openly clashed with SNP rebel Fergus Ewing in the past.
Ewing has suggested the party are "wine-bar revolutionaries", a phrase lifted from the Scottish Daily Mail, while the Greens have said the former SNP minister's "brand of conservative politics make him indistinguishable from the Tories on most issues".
READ MORE: 'Hold on a minute': Stephen Flynn continuously interrupted on BBC Question Time
Slater said there could be an opportunity for more Green politicians to be elected if the SNP shift right under new first minister John Swinney.
“People who were with the SNP when they were led by a Cabinet and a first minister who were clearly progressive, maybe feel betrayed, maybe feel this isn't the party for them anymore,” she said.
“If the SNP are going to move to the right and bill themselves as a more centrist party, then that leaves room open in the independence movement for the more radical left, which has always been us.”
The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel