A LABOUR MP has said she is “baffled” by calls for an investigation into claims Natalie Elphicke attempted to lobby ministers over her then-husband’s sexual assault case.
Shadow schools minister Catherine McKinnell squirmed as she was interviewed about explosive claims the Tory defector asked Robert Buckland, the then justice secretary, to help move the date of her husband’s sexual assault trial.
Asked by Kay Burley on Sky News whether there should be an investigation into the claims, McKinnell said: “I’m really baffled by this because this happened four years ago and he has sat on these concerns that he says are very serious to a newspaper and has not done anything about it for four years so I’m as baffled as anybody else by these assertions.
“Obviously Natalie says they’re not true, it’s not her recollection of the meeting and so, you know, she says it’s nonsense and I just can’t quite understand why if something is this important and as serious as he’s alleging why it wasn’t addressed at the time, that’s very concerning to me so I think that’s something that probably does need to be looked into.”
Should there be an investigation in to @RobertBuckland's claims about @NatalieElphicke?
— Kay Burley (@KayBurley) May 13, 2024
Shadow schools minister @CatMcKinnell has her say#KayBurley SS pic.twitter.com/XnKiTLh7Km
Buckland told the Sunday Times that Elphicke, who defected to Labour last week, wanted her husband’s trial moved to avoid publicity.
He said: “She was told in no uncertain terms that it would have been completely inappropriate to speak to the judge about the trial at all.”
READ MORE: Labour MP 'left in tears' by Natalie Elphicke defection as Starmer faces backlash
Speaking on Times Radio on Monday morning, Elphicke said: “Natalie disputes the account of the claim and what conversations were had prior to joining the party in relation to her past events.”
Asked whether Labour would investigate the claims, McKinnell said: “Not that I’m aware or I’ve been informed of. She disputes the account, an account in a newspaper. There hasn’t actually been a complaint made as far as I’m aware, but obviously if there is that will be looked at.”
Charlie Elphicke's trial was due to be one of the first cases after Covid restrictions were lifted in courts which, potentially, could have meant a greater focus on the case, the BBC reported.
He was jailed in 2020 at Southwark Crown Court for two years for sexually assaulting two women.
"There hasn't actually been a complaint made as far as I'm aware."@CatMcKinnell says she's not aware of any investigation by Labour into reports that Natalie Elphicke lobbied Robert Buckland when he was justice minister before her ex-husband's trial.
— Times Radio (@TimesRadio) May 13, 2024
📻 https://t.co/WNyWFxEjV9 pic.twitter.com/LnYG7jXrny
Natalie Elphicke replaced her ex-husband as MP for Dover after he was charged, and announced that their marriage was ending after he was convicted.
She was suspended from the Commons for one day after she and four other Conservative MPs had attempted to influence legal proceedings by writing to senior members to raise concerns about a more junior judge who was considering publishing character references provided for Elphicke's husband.
READ MORE: New Labour MP ‘lobbied justice secretary to interfere in husband’s sex offence trial’
And she apologised last week after an interview re-emerged in which she defended her ex-husband as an “easy target” for what she said were false allegations because he was “attractive”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here