A SENIOR leader at a Scottish university has insisted reducing the number of international students coming to the UK would be “calamitous”.
Such a move could harm the economy, skills and jobs, Professor Dame Sally Mapstone, president of Universities UK (UUK), has said, branding such a move “unnecessary”.
In March, Home Secretary James Cleverly asked for a review of whether the graduate visa route is “undermining the integrity and quality” of the higher education system.
"It would be a tragedy"
— Sky News (@SkyNews) May 12, 2024
The Principal of @univofstandrews, Dame Sally Mapstone tells Sky's @TrevorPTweets the government's possible crack down on the number of international students coming into the UK is "a very big issue"#TrevorPhillips https://t.co/fhIHlpTGAF
📺 Sky 501 pic.twitter.com/QhYykM9A5a
A report from the review is due to be received by the UK Government.
The professor, who is also principal and vice-chancellor of the University of St Andrews in Scotland, made her comments on the Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme on Sky News.
Phillips asked: “It’s being said that because of their concerns about overall immigration numbers, (the Conservatives) want to reduce the number of international students. Is that an issue for you?”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour's newest election candidate is based in London
Mapstone said: “It is a very big issue for us. International students are incredibly important to UK culture.
“They contribute a huge amount to universities, to the economy, to skills and jobs and we think it would be a tragedy, calamitous not just for institutions but actually for the UK as a whole, if the Government took what would actually be quite unnecessary further action to restrict the number of international students coming into the UK.”
In March, Cleverly (below) wrote to the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC), to assess if the graduate visa route – which allows overseas graduates to stay in the UK for two or three years after graduation – is supporting the UK to attract and retain “the brightest and the best”.
He said he wanted to ensure that the graduate route was “not being abused” and that some of the demand for study visas “is not being driven more by a desire for immigration rather than education”.
University leaders warned in February that the Government could “damage” the economies of towns and cities with policies which deter international students.
Universities UK suggested that uncertainty over the Government’s commitment to the UK’s post-study work offer is affecting the decision-making of prospective students.
Tory peer Lord Jo Johnson, the former universities minister, has also called for the Government not to make cuts to international student numbers, calling the idea “self-defeating”.
He said: “Slashing the graduate route would set back so many important Government policy priorities: Global Britain, levelling up, exports, science superpower. It’s hard to think of a policy more self-defeating, and all for what? To lower immigration stats which international students shouldn’t be part of anyway.
READ MORE: Secret Union polling campaign over as MP slams UK Government
“The sooner they are treated as migrants only when they actually indicate an intention to immigrate by applying for the graduate (visa) or a skilled economic work visa, the better.
“In a rational world, overseas students would be treated as temporary residents or tourists, with which they share many characteristics.”
A Government spokesperson said: “We must strike the balance between acting decisively to tackle net migration and attracting the brightest students to study at our universities.
“In December, we announced an independent expert review of the Graduate route to prevent any abuse and ensure it is working in our interests, attracting and retaining the best talent.
“We are providing significant financial support of nearly £6 billion per year to the higher education sector, plus more than £10 billion per year in tuition fee loans.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel