A HEAVY police presence has arrived at Malmo’s main square ahead of planned protests against Israel’s inclusion in this year’s Eurovision.
Officers in more than five vans arrived in Stortorget ahead of Eden Golan, representing Israel, taking to the stage on Thursday night.
The Swedish Police Authority positioned themselves at various entrances to the square as tourists walked around taking pictures.
Golan (above) was booed off the stage as the crowd chanted “free Palestine” during her performance in the Jury Show on Wednesday night.
A pro-Palestinian march will take place in the afternoon, which a spokesman for the force said would cause “disturbance to traffic”.
The organisers of the march say the demonstration will take place at 3pm, with it ending at Molleplatsen park.
READ MORE: Netanyahu is the main obstacle to peace and must be made to go
Officers from Sweden, along with Norway and Denmark, have been regularly patrolling Malmo Arena, the city centre and the Eurovision village amid Israel facing calls to be excluded from the contest because of the war in Gaza.
Golan’s song Hurricane was reworked from a previous track called October Rain, which was thought to reference the Hamas attacks on Israel.
There have been continued demonstrations in Sweden over Israel’s participation, and the week of Eurovision has already seen small gatherings in Malmo and at the Eurovision village when Austrian 2014 winner Conchita Wurst was on stage.
Golan, 20, will compete against Norway’s Gate, San Marino’s band Megara, Switzerland’s Nemo and Danish entrant Saba, who called for a ceasefire in Gaza and the “safe return” of Israeli hostages in a joint statement in March.
The artists rejected calls from Palestinian groups to boycott the music contest, saying that they “firmly believe in the unifying power of music”.
Golan, who has been singing and dancing on stage since she was a child, told ITV News this week that she could not have asked “for a better year to be representing my country”.
Organisers of Eurovision, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), hit out in April against the “unacceptable and totally unfair” abuse of competitors amid “the backdrop of a terrible war in the Middle East”.
The group, whose members approved Israeli broadcaster Kan, has taken a strong stance, as in previous years, against political messages at Eurovision and flags and symbols from non-competing countries.
Despite the position, Tuesday’s first semi-final saw former Swedish contestant and opening act Eric Saade wear a keffiyeh pattern material, commonly used by people who want to show they are pro-Palestinian, on his arm.
The EBU said that he “chose to compromise the non-political nature of the event” and it “regrets” the broadcast.
In an Instagram story, Saade said that the material was a “way of showing a part of my origin” and was a gift as a child from his father, who is of Palestinian origin.
He also said: “I just wanted to be inclusive and wear something that is authentic to me – but the EBU seems to think my ethnicity is controversial.
“It says nothing about me, but everything about them.”
It also told Irish finalist Bambie Thug to change their body paint, which referenced the artist’s call for a ceasefire, before going on stage as the EBU maintains this could have broken the rules that are “designed to protect the non-political nature of the event”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here