SECURITY staff at Edinburgh University have been accused of “intimidating” student protesters by threatening to use WiFi data to identify them and “damage their careers”.
At a trans rights protest last October, campus security allegedly told students occupying a lecture theatre that a WiFi service called eduroam would be used to identify them.
Eduroam is a free, global WiFi service for university staff and students which can be used at academic institutions around the world.
In “exceptional circumstances”, Edinburgh University can use the WiFi data for internal investigations, a freedom of information request has now revealed.
Critics said the potential for a university to use eduroam for surveillance has “serious implications” for freedom of speech and assembly. The University and College Union (UCU) Edinburgh told The Ferret it has “repeatedly raised concerns” with university management about security at campus protests.
READ MORE: Scottish activist speaks out after Freedom Flotilla to Gaza blocked
But Edinburgh University said it fully supports the right to peaceful protest and has “never used WiFi user data to identify anyone involved in demonstrations”. Its security team denied threatening students and was cleared after an internal investigation but staff have been told to “revisit training” on eduroam.
The Ferret’s revelations follow violence erupting on university campuses in the US over the Hamas-Israel war and pro-Palestinian students occupying some university campuses in the UK.
The Edinburgh University protest at the centre of controversy took place on October 11, 2023, at 40 George Square, a building on campus previously named the David Hume Tower.
The demonstration was over the launch of a book called “Sex and Gender: A Contemporary Reader” which was branded transphobic by critics.
However, the co-editors of the book responded by saying that the claims of transphobia were libellous, and the university allowed the event to proceed, saying it is committed to free speech, respectful debate and discussion, as well as the right to protest.
An estimated 40 protesters were outside the event, with many holding a range of different LGBTQ+ flags. University security and police also attended.
Several staff and student groups – including Staff Pride Network and UCU – had signed an open letter arguing it was inappropriate for the book launch to take place.
Earlier that day, students had occupied 40 George Square to try to prevent the event from taking place – and this is when security allegedly threatened to use WiFi to identify protesters, some of whom wore masks to protect their identities.
The Ferret has seen a statement by security stating that “mask-wearing at protests is illegal” and they [security] would “do everything to identify these people”.
Security later denied the students’ allegations after a formal complaint was made by a staff member. The complaint was dismissed by the university which said “there’s no evidence that protesters were threatened with the use of eduroam to identify them”.
However, it recommended that the head of security “revisits training with his team on this subject to confirm their awareness that this shouldn’t be used as a threat to discourage protesters from the occupation of university spaces”.
READ MORE: Police appeal after osprey remains found near Loch of the Lowes
The freedom of information request revealed that the institution can use WiFi user data to identify people in certain circumstances.
The permission for access to the data can be given retrospectively, and anyone using eduroam can be identified on campus.
The university’s response said: “The University of Edinburgh is a member of the Janet Roaming Service which in turn is a member of the eduroam federation.
“The eduroam service provided by Janet in the UK is a federated service that enables Janet-connected organisations to offer high-quality secure network services for visitors from other eduroam-enabled organisations, without the need for guest account management.”
It added: “Log data including user identity details, network access points, timings etc can, in exceptional circumstances, be used as part of information security, or formal HR [human resources] or student investigations. Operational data may also be combined with other university-owned data to provide actionable information.”
The staff member who submitted the FOI and the formal complaint told The Ferret, on condition of anonymity, that there are “serious implications for freedom of speech” across the UK, and that people “don’t seem to be aware that universities have this power”.
“I was stunned to learn that eduroam WiFi can be used to identify and locate anyone on university campuses,” they added.
“I don’t think students and staff would be comfortable using eduroam if they knew they would be snooped on like this.
“Freedom of assembly is more important on university campuses than arguably anywhere else. Therefore it is profoundly concerning to hear allegations that Edinburgh university security tried intimidating peaceful protesters by saying that eduroam would be used to identify protesters and damage their careers.
“When I raised my concerns about the conduct of security, management refused to review the body-camera footage from the security officers at protests, dismissing serious allegations of wrongdoing as hearsay.”
Sophia Woodman, co-president of the University and College Union (UCU) Edinburgh, said that in the last year the union has repeatedly raised concerns with university management about “instances of overreach by campus security” at protests.
READ MORE: Glasgow: Councillor hits out at 'excessive' Orange Order marches
“Management should make clear that threats to identify protesters via their use of university WiFi are unacceptable, and an infringement on the right to protest,” she added.
“There is no justification for tracking protesters in this way in the absence of any breach of the law. We call on management to clarify their use of eduroam data to everyone in the university community as soon as possible.”
A SPOKESPERSON for a campaign group at the university called Staff-Student Solidarity Network said using the technology for surveillance purposes with no oversight or need to legally justify the actions was “appalling”.
They added: “Privacy is a human right and a crucial part of a democratic society. The university should stand up for the human rights of its community but instead management treat every tool available to them as a weapon to threaten student protesters with.”
A spokesperson for Edinburgh University said: “Our professional security team are fully trained in the management of a range of scenarios, including protests. We have never used WiFi user data to identify anyone involved in demonstrations. We will always support the right to take part in lawful, peaceful and respectful protest.”
Across the UK last week, students were protesting against the war in Gaza on campus at several universities including Leeds, Newcastle and Bristol. Tents were set up outside buildings and a camp was set up by Warwick University students in the town’s piazza.
Protesters want their universities to divest from firms involved with Israel in response to its deadly military operation in the Gaza Strip.
The Union of Jewish Students issued a statement on Thursday saying Jewish students were angry, tired and hurt by “the continuous torrent of antisemitic hatred on campus” since the October 7 attacks by Hamas.
The group, which claims to represent 9,000 Jewish students in the UK and Ireland, said that while students have a right to protest, “these encampments create a hostile and toxic atmosphere on campus for Jewish students”.
However, Palestine Solidarity Campaign youth and student campaigns officer Stella Swain said: “All the protests so far have been completely peaceful. There is nothing to indicate that they wouldn’t be.”
The Prime Minister’s spokesman said police would “have our full support” if students in the UK tried to replicate protests at US universities.
READ MORE: The LGBT+ Scots maintaining a relationship with Christianity
Rishi Sunak’s spokesman said: “We’ve always been clear that people have a right to peaceful and lawful protest, but clearly, people shouldn’t abuse that right to intimidate others, [or] cause unnecessary disruption.”
The UK protests follow much larger demonstrations on campuses across the US where tent encampments of protesters calling on universities to stop working with Israel, or companies they say support the war on Gaza, have spread.
They are demanding that their schools financially divest from Israel. Divestment means to sell off stock in Israeli companies, or to otherwise drop financial ties.
More than 2000 demonstrators were arrested last week including around 300 arrests at Columbia University in New York.
Last month, the Israeli security service Mossad threatened pro-Palestinian protesters on US campuses by tweeting on Twitter/X:
“Facial recognition can determine whether you participated in the pro-Hamas protests at the universities. Your jobs and your degrees will be worthless. Your hiring opportunities will be limited.”
The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at https://theferret.scot/ and can subscribe for £5 a month here: https://theferret.scot/subscribe/
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here