THE Scottish Parliament has called out a “massively” incorrect story on the pension Humza Yousaf will receive following his resignation as First Minister.
The Guido Fawkes website ran a story on Tuesday – which has now been removed – claiming Yousaf would receive a pension of £52,000 per year for life, starting with immediate effect.
But the Scottish Parliament authorities have warned reporters against spreading this information which bosses say is factually incorrect.
Subscribe to The National for just £20 for a whole year
READ MORE: SNP leadership polling finds SNP voters back John Swinney
The Parliament has said the First Minister’s pension would actually be “in the order of” £2000 per annum, payable from age 65.
In a statement sent to the media, the Parliament said: “Humza Yousaf’s First Minister pension will be either 1/40 or 1/50 of his final salary of £104,584 (depending on which funding option he chose) for each year in office (ie one year in office).
“His First Minister pension will therefore be in the order of £2k per annum, payable from age 65.”
The Scottish Parliamentary Pensions Act 2009 removed any future entitlement to a pension of the type described in the story, bosses added.
Yousaf announced he would be staying on as First Minister until a successor can be found.
READ MORE: SNP source calls for 'deal' between John Swinney and Kate Forbes
Kate Forbes is expected to confirm whether she intends to launch a bid to become SNP leader on Wednesday, while former deputy first minister John Swinney is another figure several senior party figures have urged to stand.
New polling has found Swinney is the preferred choice among party members but Forbes is more popular with the general public.
Forbes has a six-point lead over Swinney in Ipsos polling of the Scottish public on potential successors.
However, among 2021 SNP voters, Swinney remains the top choice for the role with 30% – compared to 21% for Forbes and 14% for SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel