DONALD Trump was held in contempt of court on Tuesday and fined 9000 dollars (£7100) for repeatedly violating a gag order that barred him from making public statements about witnesses, jurors and some others connected to his New York hush-money case.
If he does it again, the judge warned, he could be jailed.
Prosecutors had alleged 10 violations, but New York Judge Juan M Merchan found there were nine.
The ruling was a stinging rebuke for the Republican former president, who had insisted he was exercising his free speech rights.
READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protest takes place outside White House correspondents' dinner
Merchan wrote that Trump “is hereby warned that the Court will not tolerate continued wilful violations of its lawful orders and that if necessary and appropriate under the circumstances, it will impose an incarceratory punishment”.
Trump stared down at the table in front of him as the judge read the ruling, frowning slightly.
The ruling came at the start of the second week of evidence in the historic case.
Manhattan prosecutors say Trump and his associates took part in an illegal scheme to influence the 2016 presidential campaign by burying negative stories.
He has pleaded not guilty.
Trump must pay the fine by the close of business on Friday, Merchan said in a written ruling.
He must also remove seven offending posts from his Truth Social account and two from his campaign website by 2:15pm on Tuesday, Merchan said.
The judge is also weighing other alleged gag order violations by Trump and will hear arguments on Thursday.
Subscribe to The National for just £20 for an entire year
Court was resuming on Tuesday with Gary Farro, a banker who helped Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen to open accounts, including one that Cohen used to buy the silence of adult film performer Stormy Daniels.
She alleged a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump, which he denies.
For his part, the former president and presumptive Republican nominee has been campaigning in his off-hours but is required to be in court when it is in session, four days a week.
Outside the courtroom, Trump criticised prosecutors again.
“This is a case that should have never been brought,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel