THE UK Government has been accused of “cynically politicising” the Post Office Horizon scandal by excluding Scotland from legislation which will exonerate wrongfully convicted sub-postmasters.
MPs are set to consider the Post Office (Horizon Systems) Offences Bill in the House of Commons on Monday but the legislation has been mired in controversy after the UK Government opted to incorporate Northern Ireland into its scope and not Scotland.
Both Scotland and Northern Ireland were originally excluded from the bill but Post Office Minister Kevin Hollinrake claimed last week the recently restored administration in Northern Ireland faced "significant and unique challenges".
He maintained it was "more appropriate" for separate Scottish legislation to be introduced but the Scottish Government has argued including Scotland in the bill would be the fastest way to secure parity.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond claims BBC interview sparked Scottish politics 'crisis'
Justice Secretary Angela Constance said said that she “fully supports” the extension of the bill to Northern Ireland but added that it is “outrageous that the UK Government has declined to also include Scotland”.
Leading campaigner and SNP MP Marion Fellows has now written to Hollinrake urging him to rethink abandoning a four nations approach, without which exoneration and financial redress for sub-postmasters in Scotland “could be significantly delayed”.
The SNP has tabled amendments which, if voted on and passed on Monday, would extend the bill to Scotland.
Fellows said: “By refusing to adopt a four nations approach, the UK Government is cynically politicising an issue on which we should all be united in our efforts to secure exoneration and full financial redress for victims of this scandal.
“Their U-turn on the inclusion of Northern Ireland to the bill shows they can include Scotland but are simply choosing not to. They should back our amendments that would change this.
“The Horizon scandal is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in our time - and the responsibility to fix this injustice falls squarely at the door of Westminster.
READ MORE: Home Office to detain asylum seekers this week amid Rwanda preparation
“Thousands of lives were ruined over decades, with people still suffering as a result of this mess, in a scandal Westminster bears partial responsibility for creating. It’s outrageous they would even consider imposing a delay only on postmasters convicted in Scotland.
“Already, far too many people have died without ever receiving the exoneration and financial redress they were due. We owe it to them and to everyone else affected by this horrible affair to deliver justice now.”
Fellows outlined in her letter that the decision means the exoneration of Scottish sub-postmasters will be delayed until the bill is enacted in the rest of the UK.
She said it would be "reckless" for the Scottish Government to legislate without having full sight of the final UK bill.
First Minister Humza Yousaf said he was “utterly furious” with the decision by the UK Government adding: “It is hard to think that the UK Government are doing anything other than using our Scottish sub-postmasters and mistresses as a political pawn.”
Around 100 Post Office sub-postmasters in Scotland were among those convicted after being wrongly accused of embezzling money.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel