A SCOTTISH Greens MSP has signalled he will not back Labour’s attempts to topple Humza Yousaf’s government.
Green MSP Mark Ruskell responded to Anas Sarwar’s announcement that Scottish Labour would table a confidence motion against the Scottish Government.
It comes after the Tories tabled a motion against the First Minister himself.
Ruskell said: “Labour clearly don’t want this motion to pass.
“It was the poor judgement of Humza [Yousaf] in ending the Bute House Agreement that is in question, not the record of the SNP/Green [government].”
READ MORE: What happens if the Scottish Government loses a no confidence vote?
It is the strongest signal so far the Greens may not back Scottish Labour’s motion, which Sarwar had been hoping may have proved more palatable to them than siding with the Tories.
Labour’s business manager Martin Whitfield is said to be meeting with Green MSPs later today to persuade them to side with his party.
While the Tory amendment focuses more narrowly on the point of tension between the Greens and the SNP – Yousaf’s decision to bin the Bute House Agreement – there is pressure from grassroots members not to side with the Conservatives.
But Labour’s motion is viewed as more likely to precipitate an early Scottish Parliament election because it would trigger the resignation of the First Minister in a way not guaranteed by the Tory motion.
If the Parliament was unable to agree on a successor first minister, the country would go to the polls after 28 days.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel