THE Scottish Government has launched its latest white paper in the Building a New Scotland series, setting out its intended approach for the justice system in the event of independence.
Despite the pro-independence majority government collapsing on Thursday morning, the decision to publish the planned document went ahead.
Independence would enable Scotland to take its own decisions to address issues such as drugs and gambling, and increase co-operation with international justice partners, the paper entitled Justice In An Independent Scotland states.
It is the 13th paper in the series and outlines how Scotland could, through membership of the EU, Council of Europe, United Nations and Interpol, play a “full part” in addressing global issues including cross-border crime, serious organised crime and cyber-crime.
The paper features proposals to restore police and prosecutors’ access to measures like the cross-border European Arrest Warrant, which were lost following Brexit.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf speaks at Bute House after ending SNP Greens coalition deal
It additionally sets out plans to fully incorporate the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) into Scots law to further enhance children’s rights and set out a framework for human rights law to protect and promote fundamental freedoms, including those in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The Scottish Government also wants to take its public health approach to violence reduction into the currently reserved areas of drug policy reform and gambling.
Justice Secretary Angela Constance said while recorded crime has fallen to near 50-year lows, there is much more Scotland could do with independence.
She said: “Scotland’s police and prosecutors would regain access to tools to pursue criminals across borders which were lost following Brexit, such as the Schengen Information System and the European Arrest Warrant.
“These are essential to combatting sophisticated criminal networks and helping victims get justice even where a perpetrator resides outwith Scotland.
“With the power to take our own decisions, we could also enhance and further embed our public health approach to justice issues, extending this to addiction such as drugs and gambling.
READ MORE: IN FULL: Scottish Greens react to being ditched from government
“This would enable future governments to consider measures that would better address the specific needs and circumstances of people in our communities, such as safer drug consumption facilities, raising the legal age of gambling, and strengthened firearm licensing.
“Combined with the broader economic, employment and social security powers that would come with independence – as set out throughout the Building a New Scotland series of papers – we could take a more effective approach to improving justice outcomes, reducing burdens on the justice system and further reducing the number of victims of crime.”
The Scottish justice system already has its own courts, tribunals, judiciary, prosecution service, police service, prisons, fire and rescue service and other justice agencies, as well as its own legal profession.
Scotland’s distinctiveness as a legal jurisdiction long pre-dates devolution and was preserved in the Acts of Union 1707, but the paper sets out the full set of benefits independence could bring.
To read the full document, click here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel