FORMER SNP chief executive Peter Murrell had two days prior warning that he was to be arrested for a second time – and so senior SNP figures also knew, a report has claimed.
Murrell, who is married to former SNP leader and first minister Nicola Sturgeon, was arrested and charged in connection with allegations of embezzlement on April 18.
He had previously been arrested and released without charge, pending further investigation, in April 2023.
The second arrest came amid a three-year long police probe into SNP finances dubbed Operation Branchform.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon speaks out after husband charged by police
According to reports in The Times, SNP government ministers knew of police plans to re-arrest Murrell two days ahead of time through the grapevine.
Sources told that paper that Murrell had been invited to a police interview under arrest on April 16 – and news spread through senior levels of the party.
However, an SNP source insisted to this paper that there "were not any rumours" and SNP politicians at Holyrood did not know of the arrest before it happened.
Murrell was arrested at 9.13am on April 18 and ultimately charged around nine hours later at 6.35pm, police said on the day.
First Minister Humza Yousaf previously said he had only heard about the news of the charge when police issued that statement.
However, he did not address when he had heard of an upcoming arrest.
In their statement on April 18, police further said: "A report will be sent to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service in due course. The man is no longer in police custody.
"The matter is active for the purposes of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 and the public are therefore advised to exercise caution if discussing it on social media."
It is understood that a report has not yet been sent to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service.
Sturgeon and former SNP treasurer Colin Beattie have also been arrested, questioned, and released without charge amid the police probe into party finances.
Neither has faced a re-arrest like Murrell.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article